|
Post by Huntnfreak on Jun 24, 2022 9:50:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Mack Apiary Bees on Jun 24, 2022 9:54:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Ahawkeye on Jun 24, 2022 10:01:08 GMT -5
Goosebumps!
|
|
|
Post by Huntnfreak on Jun 24, 2022 10:24:03 GMT -5
Thanks for that..I copied the wrong link earlier somehow..fixed it.
|
|
|
Post by Woody Williams on Jun 24, 2022 11:26:10 GMT -5
Cue the riots….
|
|
|
Post by Mack Apiary Bees on Jun 24, 2022 12:24:44 GMT -5
Time for the Patriots to step in to help the police. I bet in some cities-places the police don't show up.
|
|
|
Post by greghopper on Jun 24, 2022 17:01:00 GMT -5
Isn’t this a state by state decision now?
|
|
|
Post by greghopper on Jun 24, 2022 17:09:53 GMT -5
Yeah it’s heating up … Crazy how some people who screamed "MY BODY, MY CHOICE!" over vaccine mandates somehow have a very different view on a woman's body and abortion.
|
|
|
Post by freedomhunter on Jun 24, 2022 17:46:49 GMT -5
Having the right to not take a vaccine that could hurt you is a lot different than having the right to murder a fetus. Dont get your point, Greg
|
|
|
Post by Woody Williams on Jun 24, 2022 17:52:01 GMT -5
Isn’t this a state by state decision now? Yep…but the Dems are trying to sell this as a nation wide ban..it’s not. In fact in some states abortion could be easier and less restricted.
|
|
|
Post by greghopper on Jun 24, 2022 18:10:13 GMT -5
Having the right to not take a vaccine that could hurt you is a lot different than having the right to murder a fetus. Dont get your point, Greg I am pro life like many republicans are but I also don’t believe any child should be born into a environment where they are not wanted. I also don’t believe unwanted children should become the state/government and tax payer’s problem to raise them.
|
|
|
Post by freedomhunter on Jun 24, 2022 18:16:37 GMT -5
Having the right to not take a vaccine that could hurt you is a lot different than having the right to murder a fetus. Dont get your point, Greg I am pro life like many republicans are but I also don’t believe any child should be born into a environment where they are not wanted. I also don’t believe unwanted children should become the state/government and tax payer’s problem to raise them. Then you are not pro-life
|
|
|
Post by greghopper on Jun 24, 2022 18:45:30 GMT -5
I am pro life like many republicans are but I also don’t believe any child should be born into a environment where they are not wanted. I also don’t believe unwanted children should become the state/government and tax payer’s problem to raise them. Then you are not pro-life Obviously we are not going to agree with that statement… but that’s fine we don’t have to agree. Pro-Life…Pro-Choice!
|
|
|
Post by boman on Jun 24, 2022 19:09:23 GMT -5
I am pro life like many republicans are but I also don’t believe any child should be born into a environment where they are not wanted. I also don’t believe unwanted children should become the state/government and tax payer’s problem to raise them. Then you are not pro-life I don't believe any child should be born into an environment where they are not wanted. I also don't believe unwanted children should become the state/government and taxpayer's problem. I also can't stand some "holier than thou politician", Mike Pence comes to mind, deciding what rights a woman has with regards to her body and pregnancy. That's between her, her doctor and her God. label me as you see fit freedomhunter. Now that said, Roe vs Wade should never have been decided by the Supreme Court(which was predominately republican appointed at the time, by the way) and the decision to strike it down is the correct one according to how the Constitution is written. Its common knowledge among jurists that any right not specifically addressed in the document/Constitution is reserved for the states. Furthermore the document/Constitution is meant to separate church an state and Roe vs Wade crossed that line in my opinion. Steve
|
|
|
Post by freedomhunter on Jun 24, 2022 19:21:45 GMT -5
Then you are not pro-life I don't believe any child should be born into an environment where they are not wanted. I also don't believe unwanted children should become the state/government and taxpayer's problem. I also can't stand some "holier than thou politician", Mike Pence comes to mind, deciding what rights a woman has with regards to her body and pregnancy. That's between her, her doctor and her God. label me as you see fit freedomhunter. Now that said, Roe vs Wade should never have been decided by the Supreme Court(which was predominately republican appointed at the time, by the way) and the decision to strike it down is the correct one according to how the Constitution is written. Its common knowledge among jurists that any right not specifically addressed in the document/Constitution is reserved for the states. Furthermore the document/Constitution is meant to separate church an state and Roe vs Wade crossed that line in my opinion. Steve There is only one judge, you own it. I'm alive because my mother wanted me and defended herself so I have a little perspective. Also, my two kids wouldn't be here either because I wouldn't be here. Like Ronald said, all pro-choicers are already born.
|
|
|
Post by Ahawkeye on Jun 24, 2022 19:43:29 GMT -5
In my opinion today is a great day in U.S. history. As far as pro life vs "pro choice" neither side will be swayed to go to the other side, that argument is useless. We have won the day, and sit in a better position. Our fight is not over. As they say in football/ baseball, let's celebrate tonight! Back to work tomorrow!
|
|
|
Post by firstwd on Jun 24, 2022 20:42:57 GMT -5
"We" have not won anything. This opens up doors people just don't realize. Now that the SC says people's personal medical choices are the States to decide, there can easily be a law passed to mandate any current or future vaccines.
Also, now ANY personal choice, written into the Constitution as Liberty, can be decided by the states.
|
|
|
Post by freedomhunter on Jun 24, 2022 21:00:09 GMT -5
"We" have not won anything. This opens up doors people just don't realize. Now that the SC says people's personal medical choices are the States to decide, there can easily be a law passed to mandate any current or future vaccines. Also, now ANY personal choice, written into the Constitution as Liberty, can be decided by the states. This was about abortion. Anything else is speculation but carry on.
|
|
|
Post by jjas on Jun 24, 2022 21:13:28 GMT -5
I wonder how many men who say they are pro life would truly expect their wife or daughter to carry a child to term if they were raped and became pregnant?
|
|
|
Post by boman on Jun 24, 2022 21:31:13 GMT -5
In my opinion today is a great day in U.S. history. As far as pro life vs "pro choice" neither side will be swayed to go to the other side, that argument is useless. We have won the day, and sit in a better position. Our fight is not over. As they say in football/ baseball, let's celebrate tonight! Back to work tomorrow! so right you are about the "labels" and sides. States will take sides and make laws but the debate and heart-aching will never end until a federal law(which won't happen as long as the religious extremists have a strangle hold on the republican party) is passed that establishes and protects a woman's right to abortion in the early term... but also protects the life of the unborn child past the point of viability, unless certain clearly defined circumstances (such as rape, gross defect, and death of the mother) present themselves. Another "game we need to "win" is for this court to throw out the "right to marriage" for gay couples, another example where the Supreme Court overstretched their power and distorted the meaning of the 14th amendment. Show me where the Constitution says anything about marriage, heterosexual or otherwise. And before you "label" me I have friends who are gay--LOL Steve
|
|