|
Post by swetz on Mar 21, 2020 11:04:19 GMT -5
I'm not a medical professional, but my latest understanding is as follows.
They're still trying to figure out what the fatality rate for COVID-19 is, which is difficult given the lack of widespread testing.
However, the low end of the range put it at about 10x higher than the flu. From the last stats I recall, the flu kills about 1 in a thousand. If this kills 1 in a hundred, it's a much bigger public health issue than the flu, with a corresponding higher burden on the medical system.
People are apparently asymptomatic and still contagious for a considerable period, which makes it harder to contain since you could not feel sick, but still spread it.
As with most things, I'm trying to take a middle of the road approach with reasonable precautions. I will go to the grocery store when necessary, but not for just 1 or 2 items. I'm working out at home, rather than going to the gym.
It's inconvenient in many ways, but I'm fortunate to be in the position I am. If me passing on some things I want to do helps keep someone's elderly grandmother or father with COPD from getting sick, or delays it until more medical resources are freed up to help them, I'm happy to do it.
|
|
|
Post by swetz on Mar 15, 2020 17:03:10 GMT -5
Around a mile would probably be my limit. Getting a deer out much further than that is a bit much.
|
|
|
Post by swetz on Mar 15, 2020 9:14:27 GMT -5
I use one, but pretty much just for making a steak when weather doesn't permit grilling. Honestly, I think it puts a little better sear on the steak than my grill.
I try to wipe out the skillet while it's still warm, but it doesn't get too dirty, since it's pretty much always just used for a steak. I've never had to really scrub it though.
|
|
|
Post by swetz on Feb 20, 2020 23:11:30 GMT -5
I went once. Seeing all the trophy deer mounts was cool and there were a few good speakers, but I didn't get too much out of it.
I am in the market for a few things right now though, but I really don't want to contend with the Saturday crowd so it's probably a no for me.
|
|
|
Post by swetz on Jan 19, 2020 17:32:32 GMT -5
I used to watch pretty regularly, but haven't for quite a while. There aren't any fighters that I really follow closely anymore.
In terms of MMA vs. Boxing, I think MMA often looks more "violent" but boxers take a lot more shots to the head, which is worse in the long run for the athletes.
|
|
|
Post by swetz on Jan 12, 2020 12:29:18 GMT -5
I watched one of the videos when it first started circulating. Given how hilarious they thought their cruelty and sadism was, I'd say they definitely have "character flaws" to put it lightly.
|
|
|
Post by swetz on Dec 22, 2019 21:35:09 GMT -5
In my opinion, that's just plain STUPID, risking a possible wounded animal without confirming your shot first. You got so lucky, you better go buy a lottery ticket. Just saying. WOW.....tell how you really feel! Harsh, but warranted in my opinion. There's enough that can go wrong on a hunt even when you do everything right. Taking an weapon you've not even made an attempt at sighting in is unethical, stupid, and merits condemnation.
|
|
|
Post by swetz on Dec 17, 2019 12:54:30 GMT -5
Lots of people in and around my suburban neighborhood are freaking out about coyotes as of late. A few small dogs got grabbed over the past few weeks in the area.
I should pull some of the better quotes as you'd get quite a kick out of them. People think the city should remove them all for them and just can't seem to grasp the concept of taking their small dogs outside on a leash and not leaving them unattended.
My favorite was the lady who says she saw a wolf.
|
|
|
Post by swetz on Dec 13, 2019 17:59:21 GMT -5
It's really not even a discussion...there are numerous cases a person can reference. Liking or not liking. Supporting or not supporting. Doesn't matter. The Constitution and established case law are all that matter. That`s the same argument libs make regarding abortion, saying it`s already settled law, but abortion is going down. Nothing is "settled", especially not when it`s wrong. New laws get passed, some get struck down, but regardless of future possible outcomes, it doesn't change the current state of affairs at any point in time. For example, alcohol was legal, illegal during prohibition, and then legal again after its repeal. Regardless of potential future states or your personal preference of what you think certain individuals should be entitled to, the point still stands that as of this moment not all rights are reserved solely for US citizens.
|
|
|
Post by swetz on Dec 13, 2019 17:39:21 GMT -5
Thought you were done with this discussion...
|
|
|
Post by swetz on Dec 12, 2019 22:03:52 GMT -5
Actually, yes, it is. The courts have argued about this, with the liberal courts leaning towards favoring rights for illegals, and the conservative courts leaning towards the right and proper assessment, which is, illegal aliens have zero constitutional rights in the United States. Obviously, I favor the right and proper assessment, that illegal aliens have zero constitutional rights, not because that`s my preference, (which it is), but because it`s the right and proper, and legally judicious standpoint. I`m good with where I stand, as I know I`m right, and so, I`m done here. We could argue literally forever, but your point isn`t to defend illegals as much as it is to dispute me. And that`s fine, it`s all cool, because I know I`m right. Take care now. No, you're not right. You just have severe confirmation bias.
|
|
|
Post by swetz on Dec 12, 2019 20:11:04 GMT -5
No, case law and legal precedent are clear that not all rights are solely for citizens.
I think you are confusing your own opinion of what people should receive with legal rights.
Period and raise you an exclamation point.
|
|
|
Post by swetz on Dec 12, 2019 19:54:41 GMT -5
Certain rights may be limited or curtailed, but they do not have zero rights. You can indulge yourself with your amateur, biased, and ultra conservative delusions of jurisprudence and case law, but you are still incorrect.
|
|
|
Post by swetz on Dec 12, 2019 19:42:50 GMT -5
I'd say you're the one making statements based on your political leanings. You`re free to have your opinion and to express it. If you seriously believe criminals have rights in America, you`re not thinking clearly. Criminals do have rights in America. You can say that you think they shouldn't have certain rights or that you find it distasteful, but it's simply inaccurate to claim they don't.
|
|
|
Post by swetz on Dec 12, 2019 7:39:01 GMT -5
So your saying the LAWYER in the link has it wrong or you don’t agree with his findings? Personally I probably go with the LAWYERS findings unless someone else that’s a LAWYER can debunk his statement! There are liberals who are judges, that rule based not upon the law, but upon their political leanings. That is exactly what this lawyer did, he`s writing based upon his political leanings. If this article were a case and it went before the Supreme Court, it would be overturned because there's zero legal basis for it. I'd say you're the one making statements based on your political leanings.
|
|
|
Post by swetz on Dec 11, 2019 21:31:59 GMT -5
Sorry, but I don't think ANY non-citizen should be able to get hands on a gun. Some are of the mistaken thinking that non-U.S. citizens have constitutional rights, and that`s flat-out wrong. Period. I'm not a lawyer, but my understanding is that some rights are explicitly reserved for citizens, others apply to "persons". The latter being legally interpreted as all people within the US without regard to citizenship status.
|
|
|
Post by swetz on Dec 3, 2019 12:37:26 GMT -5
Yeah. A lot of people feel pretty entitled to just go wherever they want. It really makes me angry. I worked for a long time to be able to afford my own exclusive place. Either do that or go to the nearby public forest.
I've only picked up one trespasser on camera in the past couple years. However, I have seen some evidence of trespassers a couple times. It doesn't seem as frequent as what you're dealing with, but I also don't have cameras all over the place so it's quite possible I don't catch everything going on. There have been some issues with people four wheeling on an old logging road on the border between my place and the neighbors, but the entrance to that is gated and on my neighbor's property. I know the lock has been cut a few times though.
The CO I dealt with was pretty responsive. I sent him the photos and he said he asked around, but no one knew him, so nothing really came of it.
My general policy is to contact law enforcement so at least there is a record. I'm not from the area where I own land so I don't have any contacts around and I wouldn't expect anyone is going to snitch on their family member or friend to me.
What I'm most concerned about is if my wife encounters a trespasser when she's out hunting.
|
|
|
Post by swetz on Dec 2, 2019 23:35:21 GMT -5
I find this whole thread very interesting, I have never given any thought to saddle hunting. Is it really better than a climber? By no means am I being disrespectful, what are the pros and cons of this? So compared to a climber, you can use sticks and some other climbing methods to get in trees that a climber won't work in. You can also save some significant weight using a saddle even with sticks. Some of the big pros are mobility, ability to shoot a wider area around the tree, and you can sort of hide behind the tree as the deer come in. You can also just buy one saddle rather than multiple stands. Cons are learning curve and the amount of practice required. To be safe and efficient, you need to have your system down. I hunt private land, but I don't have an ATV or anything so it's a lot of work for me to drag out and setup a ladder stand. I'm pretty happy with my setup, but have a few other things I want to try.
|
|
|
Post by swetz on Dec 2, 2019 23:21:06 GMT -5
I find this whole thread very interesting, I have never given any thought to saddle hunting. Is it really better than a climber? By no means am I being disrespectful, what are the pros and cons of this? I like the idea of only having only having to buy one tree saddle, instead of a bunch of individual stands. But, my kids are young and it won't work to take them hunting with me. I'm not trying to convince you to use a saddle or anything, but I've seen a few guys use a tree saddle on the opposite side of a tree with their kid in a ladder stand. I haven't tried it, but they said it worked pretty well since they were facing the same direction and they could coach their kid.
|
|
|
Post by swetz on Dec 2, 2019 16:08:57 GMT -5
I have muddy pro sticks, hawk helium sticks, and a seat from a climbing tree stand that I use as a climbing platform. I don't like the muddy pros and retired my set this year. Too much play in the stand offs and doesn't feel very stable or safe. Would you be interested in parting with them? If i wouldn't want them I know a buddy who does. Sorry, but no. I don't find them safe/stable enough, so I'm taking my set out of circulation.
|
|