|
Post by swetz on Jul 5, 2020 20:44:59 GMT -5
These are the criminal acts that all the "protesters" should be concerned with. While watching NBC5 Chicago news recently they reported 47 people shot in one day with a 1 year old child being killed while riding in a car with his mother. It will be close to those same numbers all summer. If they were truly concerned with BLM they would and should be protesting the number of lives lost by their own hands. But the TRUTH is, they`re NOT concerned with bettering the lives of anyone, they`re pushing ahead with a globalist agenda, and in order to do so, that HAVE to tear America down, tear us apart at the seams, from within. But it still won`t be easy. Every law-abiding, 3%, reasoned American MUST begin to ask themselves the question: what is the tipping point? How far will anarchy displace law and order, how long will mob rule push off the precepts of the Constitution, and, how long will We the People allow this criminal liberal puppet media to continue to incite to riot, misrepresent, and flat-out lie, before we stand up and demand that reporters become journalists, that the Indianapolis mayor and Indiana governor enforce the law and stop these animals from burning, looting and intimidating Indianapolis and Indiana, and that our elected employees finally uphold their oath to uphold and defend the United States Constitution, from ALL enemies, both foreign and domestic? Are you a 3%er?
|
|
|
Post by swetz on Jun 28, 2020 21:20:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by swetz on Jun 28, 2020 15:35:03 GMT -5
I'm not. Just wondering whats the purpose of the article. I`ve heard the rumors of the so-called "no go zones", suggesting that sharia law has been set up. I honestly have no idea whether that`s actually going on or not, but even just the suggestion that it MIGHT be happening is repulsive. The only one I've seen any confirmation of is in Seattle. Where have you heard such rumors about any in Minnesota and what would indicate that such "no go zones" would be under Sharia law?
|
|
|
Post by swetz on Jun 28, 2020 10:16:58 GMT -5
Yes, it’s too early to let that cat out of the bag.. 😉 🤔 So are you guys insinuating that you think this is true despite no apparent actual evidence or corroboration? That representative's district doesn't even include Minneapolis.
|
|
|
Post by swetz on Jun 28, 2020 8:09:05 GMT -5
Wi-fi calling uses your wireless internet rather than a cell signal.
You may want to consider using wi-fi calling if your cell coverage is poor, but your wireless internet is available. It also doesn't count against your cell plan minutes. So, you may also want to consider it if your plan does not include unlimited calling.
I sometimes find that I do still get disconnected when using wi-fi calling.
|
|
|
Post by swetz on Jun 28, 2020 7:57:40 GMT -5
That article just says the same thing that Steve Green made the statement during the meeting. Later it says "It should go without saying that, no, people are not trying to impose “Muslim rule” on Minneapolis, but we kind of end up having to say it a lot." So far it still seems to be false. Yes, it’s too early to let that cat out of the bag.. 😉 I don't follow.
|
|
|
Post by swetz on Jun 27, 2020 23:44:51 GMT -5
That article just says the same thing that Steve Green made the statement during the meeting. Later it says "It should go without saying that, no, people are not trying to impose “Muslim rule” on Minneapolis, but we kind of end up having to say it a lot." So far it still seems to be false.
|
|
|
Post by swetz on Jun 27, 2020 21:04:36 GMT -5
So my reading of the article was that this was all based on the remarks of one politician. Is there any evidence or independent corroboration of the claims he made? Havnt heard any more about it I'm not convinced this is actually a thing. I can't find any information that says this happened. It seems like a remark made by one person in a meeting.
|
|
|
Post by swetz on Jun 27, 2020 18:30:26 GMT -5
So my reading of the article was that this was all based on the remarks of one politician.
Is there any evidence or independent corroboration of the claims he made?
|
|
|
Post by swetz on Jun 26, 2020 10:44:55 GMT -5
I've never put in for one of these, but have considered it since some would be a lot closer to home than where I typically hunt.
Worth it in anyone's experience?
|
|
|
Post by swetz on Jun 25, 2020 18:07:06 GMT -5
"A Minnesota lawmaker said last week Antifa and Muslim organizations plan to “police Minneapolis under Muslim rule,” communism is moving into Minneapolis-St. Paul and the state’s Democratic attorney general would like to “close down all of northern Minnesota.”"
And
"After the county board chair questioned whether there was an alternative public safety plan, Green said Antifa and Muslim organizations plan to “police Minneapolis under Muslim rule,” according to the Enterprise. He also claimed some representatives have a bill that would impose eminent domain on every business destroyed during the Floyd protests and “only sell back to people under conditions” imposed by the city."
Does this gentleman have any evidence to support his claims?
|
|
|
Post by swetz on Jun 21, 2020 13:33:28 GMT -5
I assumed tearing down of monuments; name changing etc was what censorship was implying That's not censorship.
|
|
|
Post by swetz on Jun 20, 2020 13:10:15 GMT -5
What censorship are you referring to?
|
|
|
Post by swetz on Jun 11, 2020 20:17:14 GMT -5
Sorry for your loss.
|
|
|
Post by swetz on Jun 6, 2020 23:45:01 GMT -5
So what if the whole time you worked you would’ve had to stay at the same facility 24/7 365 have your family sold and or used however someone else saw fit. I’d still take my chance with the lynching and poverty situation you describe is hypothetical and you assume what a slaves life was like.---Slaves for the most part got weekends off, went to visit other slave neighbors went to town etc. Never have found hard evidence as to how often or how many families were broken up. I do know it happened. Don't buy the narrative---read and learn---I can suggest some books---three come to mind written by women of the south who lived thru the war. Slaves had the weekends off? I think you've stretched the limits of credulity past the breaking point.
|
|
|
Post by swetz on Jun 6, 2020 21:58:39 GMT -5
How is there more to slavery than right and wrong? Institution of Slavery is wrong anyone knows that, myself included. Nfalls seems to want to make it a right or wrong issue( was thinking black or white but probably not the appropriate words considering what's going on right now--LOL) and asked how the slaves were the real loosers. What I was/am trying to say in answer to his question is the slaves as freed men didn't gain the same rights as the whites who fought against the north when the war was over. They couldn't vote until the 14th amendment---1868?? for example and then were intimidated with the same threats(excepting being sold or bought) Plus actual lynchings, shootings etc. Field hands were forced back to doing the same work for room and board as before with a token pay to satisfy "reconstruction". A lot of them who moved north and were subjected to abject poverty if they didn't have a skill, far worse than living as a slave with room and board and on and on and on. What I was really saying earlier when I said the slaves were the real loosers is in this context. If he or you or anyone else think the confederate white lost the civil war and the slave was the winner based on his freedom so be it. I'm not so sure Steve I'd rather die an impoverished free man than live as a slave. You are downplaying the reality of life as a slave. You think "room and board" is much comfort when the overseer takes your wife or daughter whenever he pleases?
|
|
|
Post by swetz on Jun 6, 2020 20:29:17 GMT -5
Oh I get it being owned sold and bartered has to be better. I bet you can ask anyone who has been enslaved and they would prefer to not be owned and controlled. You ever see how happy people are to retire? Nope not saying either thing---just saying there's way more to it than right or wrong. Not sure where this came from but Yes, I'm more than happy being retired, was fortunate enough to retire at 55, I'm 70 now. Steve How is there more to slavery than right and wrong?
|
|
|
Post by swetz on Jun 6, 2020 19:45:18 GMT -5
Good, why should we celebrate our opponents. Bet the people wishing to keep it would have a different opinion if it was Viet Cong soldiers or Ho Chi Minh or Saddam or Jane Fonda or a tribute to the ss. Maybe I’m just dense but how were the blacks the ones who really lost with the civil war? Nfalls, the blacks(slaves) were the real loosers in the sense that they went from an ordered society where they were subject to a whipping or being sold for misbehavior(contrary to popular belief slaves were not mistreated as a rule(would you damage an asset?) to being subject to lynching, shot etc with no real gain in rights as free men. One needs to understand reconstruction which took a lot of years and never really got the former slaves the same rights as the white people in the south. It was still going on in the 60's(segregation). It takes a lot of reading. A bit of trivia--- Yankee U.S. Grant came from a strong abolitionist family, none of whom attended his wedding, he married the daughter of a plantation slave owner, owned one slave(whom he later freed) and fought against several friends who attended his wedding and became Condederate generals---for the preservation of the Union. Lincoln freed the slaves against his own judgment which is in writing. (He wanted to win the election) The South did fight for the preservation of their society and not states rights as our school books taught us. There were free blacks who owned slaves. Steve So you're saying they were better off as someone's property to be raped, separated from their family at their master's whim, and whipped because society was "ordered"?
|
|
|
Post by swetz on Jun 5, 2020 9:17:52 GMT -5
Like it or not, everything has become political, and in my opinion, that`s driven primarily by a liberal puppet media driving an agenda. One of the things that frustrates me the most are people who aren`t "political". If you aren`t informed on all the political drivers and nuances today, you`re absolutely abdicating your responsibilities as a U.S. citizen. Our constitutional rights are the things to thank God for, (second only to salvation), and our rights aren`t granted to us by government, and aren`t even granted to us by the Constitution. These are God granted rights, and the Constitution merely acknowledges them, and supposedly keeps government from infringing upon them. I thank God for being able to speek freely and express whatever I think. Someplace like that is where I`ll spend my time and energy; where there`s no censorship and squashing of any of my rights. Let us know when you find this place.... Surely your not trying to imply your be censored “Here”! That's another thing to consider. Non-government organizations who provide forums or social media platforms can set their terms of service and what they will allow on their turf. For example here, Woody can delete any thread or comment that he wants. That's not equivalent to being censored by the government.
|
|
|
Post by swetz on Jun 3, 2020 22:14:55 GMT -5
Freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from all social or personal consequences. It's always been that way really.
You're perfectly free to go into your boss' office and say how ugly their family is while pointing and laughing at the photos on their desk. You won't go to prison, but you probably won't work there much longer.
I think we are just more exposed to people's thoughts and inner monologues with social media in ways that we weren't before.
|
|