|
Post by swilk on Jul 16, 2010 11:39:08 GMT -5
Actually, I dont think I will participate in these types of threads on this site anymore.
I am smart enough to not try and play against a stacked deck.
Everyone have a nice day.
|
|
|
Post by Woody Williams on Jul 16, 2010 14:11:20 GMT -5
Funny, I thought we were discussing the results of surveys. Its okay though .... you have actually answered my question. What I 'thought' that we were discussing was HH's original post when he said -" If this rule change was about reducing the herd and doe harvest, crossbows in all archery season would have done both." I referenced the surveys that addressed THAT subject. Nothing else. Somehow you took it on a tangent with the other questions on the online survey that were asked which had nothing to do with in all archery season would have done both." The 65 and over, the UDZs and the firearm seasons were bones tossed to the crossbowers. The organized hunting group bone tossers voted for these cause that is where they would like to see us. I'm sure that a lot of crossbowers voted yea there too as something is better than nothing. I know that I did. IF I had thought it was a contest between each on of these I would have voted no for the others and yea on "all archery seasons". Now, if you think I referencd the on line survey so we could talk about which one was preferable you were wrong. I tried to stick to the subject at hand. I don't mind talking about the others if you want to start another thread..
|
|
|
Post by tickman1961 on Jul 17, 2010 11:27:04 GMT -5
Contradictory? How so? I happily share the woods with anyone hunting with a legal weapon. How is that contradictory? How does one go from "no crossbows during early archery" to "happily share the wooods with anyone hunting with a legal weapon" Easy to say when crossbows are not legal equipment for early archery....
|
|