New World Record Buck Covered up?

But the fact remains that the President order the rack to not be panel scored and forbade anyone to re-score the deer.. So in fact they are not fallowing their own rules and there by are setting themselves up to wear egg on their face and the man in charge just told everyone basically they had to take their ball home and could not play by the established rules ... So yep its about the rules and one man don't make them ... He is ruling by intimidation and fear and making decisions and ruling outside the letter of the clubs rules.

FYI- This is likely not over by a long shot and I would guess that the President would of been hard pressed to be re-elected there next election and now they have a "new president" and suddenly the buck is back up for panel scoreing. Go figure.. Hunting Public outcry and the clubs reputation being thrashed .

And the King buck will be panel scored after all --

www.deeranddeerhunting.com/deer-and-deer-hunting-magazine/big-bucks-boone-and-crockett-will-score-king-buck-as-potential-new-world-record-whitetail

My only concern out all this horn worshiping....was the meat handled correctly and how did it taste!!!

Relate it to the Miss American contest. Ever see a winner have one ear the size of a grapefruit and the other typical size.

First off, there is no such thing as gross score. It is listed for informational purposes ONLY. Generally, you see it for deer that don't qualify or don't get officially scored. It won't get your deer in the record book.

Second, the buck that scored the highest is biggest according to these rules. Which by the way are considered THE RULES to play by. Even deer behind high fences are often shown as such and such B & C, even though
they can't be scored by this system.

Third, the B & C system rewards for symetry typical antlers, and adds non-typical growth to the NT cat. Period. If you want to count every inch of bone, there are systems available that do that, but known are accepted as the standard, with the exception of Safari Club rules some what.

Fourth, I suspect the reason you DON"T like this system is the same reason those that make the book with a qualifying deer DO like it. It takes an exceptional deer to make the book, and most peole never kill one.

Here is a good Question.


Tom Lets say you kill a Buck that scores 160 before deductions.


I also kill a Buck that scores 160 before Deductions.


So, both of our Bucks have 160 inches of Antler.



Your Buck has 10 points of deductions, and Net Scores 150 inches.

My Buck only has 3 points of Deductions, and Net Scores 157 inches.


Who has the larger Buck ?

Keep in mind both of our Bucks have 160 inches of Antler before the Deductions.



Which Buck is actually Larger ? keep in mind they both had the same Gross Score.















Also, I wonder how many Bucks are killed in America every year that Gross Score over 160 Typical, and 180 Non Typical ? I would say thousands. But after the pointless deductions they often score much Less.


Lets say two guys both kill Bucks that Gross Score 165 Typical. One Buck has 7 points of deductions and net scores 158 typical, the other Buck has 3 points deductions, and net scores 162 Typical.


So even though Both of these Bucks have 165 inches of Antler, one makes the B&C Record Book, and the other does not. I find that kind of ridiculous.


So, there are Bucks that do NOT make the books, that have just as much Antler as Bucks that do make the record Books.

As stated, FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. Once it's scored, it's then listed as a net score where ever it ranks. Example is a buck that grossed 175 but nets 169 7/8" makes the honorable mention ranks for one year then disappears, never making the all-time book.

If a deer has 200 inches he should be scored 200 inches. Deductions? Seems like childs play to me.

It is exactly the same over here in Europe for roe bucks, points can be added or taken off for good looks etc its all in the eye of the man marking the trophy, it is that ridiculous that i have sheered away from the nonsense all my life and hunt because i just love to hunt Bucks or doe's it does not matter one jot to me. six pointer or spikes i do not care its all fun to me.
You never ever see Billy disappointed when i walk up to the animal.
I have seen that look so many times on clients faces.

Ought to leave one's competitiveness somewhere else, that and guns in a hunting environment are a recipe for eventual disaster it is in my view the greatest cause of shots been taken when in actual fact it was not a safe shot in the first place.
it is the oh big one i must have it must have it factor.
I preach this at work and sorry but that is my view.
regards
stay safe
Billy

KL,

How many times are you going to post the same thing over and over and over again?

It's getting real old...