Did I say it is Anti Veteran? No.
I said it will, does and HAS placed hundreds of thousands to MILLIONS of INNOCENT PEOPLE into the NICS because bigoted people are afraid of "mental illness".
I read your link, now read mine:
A direct rebuttal:
www.gunowners.org/ne0713.htmA couple somewhat newer than your Oct 2007 article:
www.gunowners.org/a010808.htmwww.gunowners.org/a122007.htmOr maybe this:
In an unrecorded voice vote the gun grabbing bill once known at HR 297, HR 2640 also known as "The Veteran's Disarmament Act" by Pro 2nd Amendment grass roots organizations across America, passed, and will soon be on the way to President Bush for signature or veto.
The bill calls for a guilty before being proven innocent program of separating which Americans may realize the 2nd amendment and which may not. According to the bill any past, present, or future "thought crime" may threaten your right to purchase or own a firearm. Without a trial!
The core of the bill's problems is section 101(c)(1)(C), which makes you a "prohibited person" on the basis of a "medical finding of disability," so long as a citizen or veteran had an "opportunity" for some sort of "hearing" before some "lawful authority" (other than a court). Presumably, this "lawful authority" could even be the psychiatrist himself.
*Note that unlike with an accused murderer, the hearing doesn't have to occur. The "lawful authority" doesn't have to be unbiased. The citizen or veteran is not necessarily entitled to an attorney -- much less an attorney financed by the government. Children with past diagnosis for ADHD, People diagnosed with Alzheimer's, veterans dealing with PTSD and who seek psychiatric help, men and woman who are charged or suspected of domestic violence, and anyone currently under medication for psychiatric reasons what so ever... Are targets of HR 2640.
We are forcing people choose between what may be essential mental help and counseling, or their 2nd amendment rights.
Funding for implementation on a state level is based on a "secret formula" set by the US Attorney General in order for the states to obtain the funding necessary to pay for this very expensive data base.
We have alerted the public to the nascent no fly lists, the coming no work lists, now we must alert you to the no gun list. We have in effect become a nation of lists, in the order of Stalin's Russia, Hitler's Germany, or Mao's China. Unless we want to realize the communism, socialism, or fascism of these failed prison states, we must act NOW or lose everything the United States of America and its constitution stands for.
So where is the NRA in all of this? It was in fact the NRA that helped legislate this bill all along. They own this lock stock and barrel!
Here is what NRA spokesperson Rachel Parsons had to say about supporting HR 2640 with Ted Kennedy, Chuck Schumer, Diane Feinstein, Frank Lautenberg, and Carolyn McCarthy: "We want a clean bill. If this becomes a Christmas tree of gun control, we will absolutely remove support from this bill" Three months later they did NOT remove support.
And this is exactly what we ended up with. A Rockefeller Center style Christmas tree lit up with more gun CONTROL than all previous gun control bills combined. Like thieves in the night, in a secret vote, with NO PUBLIC debate, with no mention by all but one of the Republican presidential candidates (that one is Ron Paul) with no coverage by the big 5 media companies, without a care for liberty and the Constitution... Our 2nd amendment rights have been put in the hands of George W. Bush.
Every indicator seems to show that Mr. Bush, an alleged conservative will sign this nightmarish bill.
We might have time to stop him and we certainly have time to let the president know that we want this bill vetoed until such a time when Americans can have a thoughtful debate on what we are getting into with HR 2640.
We have time, not much, to send a message to the Senate and Republican minority leader Mitch McConnell to reconsider sending this to the president, and we have the entire year to challenge each of the candidates running for president on where they stand on such a bill.
This is especially important if those running as sitting senators, and congressmen voted for this bill while posing as supporters of the right to keep and bear arms.
We ask you this week to call into radio talk shows, to write your newspapers, and television networks to ask them why they have not addresses this issue before their audiences, and where they stand on the issue. We ask you this week to ask all of the candidates for President in 2008 to clarify where they stand on the issue of 2640, have they read the bill, and did they support it yes or no! We ask you this week to call you senators and congresspersons, and the White House to tell them that you do NOT support 2640, or anyone who endorses it.
We ask you on Friday January 11th 2008 at 12 Noon in your time zone to go to your state capitols, halls of government, media outlets, and to the White House with signs, banners and leaflets to alert the public to HR 2640 and to ask for their help in stopping it. Our goal is to get media attention to get this bill before the public eye. WITHOUT YOUR HELP WE WILL LOSE!
If we do not do anything it won't be long before, on the smallest of pretexts, YOU will lose your rights to legally own a firearm, and it won't be long before like in the UK, the government will come for your butter knives.
If you would like more information on this subject, or would like to schedule an interview please contact Jack Blood at jackblood@hotmail.com
RESOURCES:
Gun Owners Get Stabbed In The Back - Veterans Disarmament Act on its way to the President
www.gunowners.org/a122007.htm(703)321-8585 Larry Pratt - Director
www.jpfo.org/McCarthy and NRA ambush gun owners, sneak Gun Control through Senate and House
nationalgunrights.org/alerts/2007-mccarthynra.shtml(FULL TEXT OF THE BILL HERE) NAGR Phone: (888) 874-3006 - Dudley Brown
- Director
Sept 6th 2007 interview Jack Blood with Rachel Parson of the NRA:
video.google.com/videoplay?docid=175415874751235706Jack Blood covers NRA backed Gun Control with Dudley Brown of NationalGunRights.org and Larry Pratt of GunOwners.org
video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1529101058692499496&hl=enGEORGE W BUSH CONTACT INFO: BY PHONE - Comments: 202-456-1111
Switchboard: 202-456-1414 / FAX: 202-456-2461
MITCH McConnell's SENATE OFFICE, DC 361-A Russell Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Phone: (202) 224-2541 Fax: (202)
224-2499
mcconnell.senate.gov/mcconnell.senate.gov/contact_form.cfm email
Congressman RON PAUL'S action notice:
www.ronpaul2008.com/gunowners/write-your-senator Sample Email Opposing HR 2640 Dear Senator [Senator's Name Here], I am very disappointed that the Senate Judiciary Committee passed out HR 2640 on and unrecorded vote, just as the House did. This bill will solve nothing but will expose hundreds of thousands of private medical records to organizations that have already proven they cannot be trusted to accurately deal with personal information. Furthermore, the liability that people face when accused of being mentally incompetent to own a firearm will discourage people with personal issues from seeking medical help. I strongly urge you to reject the Senate version of HR 2640. Very truly yours, [Your Name Here]
Send Emails to your appropriate Senator. Email forms for all Senators can be found at:
www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm-------------------
Of course it's too late for that now.
The Government has its Judenstern. It remains to be seen how they will abuse it.
A quote from Senator Coburn of OK:
Sen. Coburn sent a pointed letter to officials at the Department of Veterans Affairs, asking them to justify their actions. Coburn states that Veterans Affairs continues to send the names of “approximately 1,000 additional veterans” to the Department of Justice every month. According to the Congressional Research Service, Coburn says, this has resulted in “approximately 140,000 Veterans” being added to the NICS background check system.
“This situation is concerning to me,” he continues, “as the vast majority of these veterans have committed no crime.” Coburn correctly notes that if a veteran should continue to own a
firearm, he could “unknowingly be in violation” of federal law.
And the BATFE takes the position that, if a veteran is barred from owning a gun, then everyone in his family is also “constructively”
barred.Interestingly, Coburn notes that the VA gun ban for veterans is not based on a veteran being a “danger to him/herself or others” but rather for supposedly being “unable to manage one’s own
affairs.” Coburn ends his letter with a very pointed request: “I respectfully request that you share with me your plans to prevent the release of more veterans’ names without due process.” Denying gun rights without due process That’s the key: most of these brave souls are being denied their gun rights without due process. Some have claimed that this bill would provide relief for those who are being unjustly denied. Of course, this is very questionable since Congress has, since 1993, defunded the ability of the BATFE to restore the rights of veterans and other victims of gun control under current law. (This is the result of a
Chuck Schumer amendment.)
---------------
Chuck Shumer co-sponsors a bill to "provide relief", but has consistantly denied providing FUNDING relief under existing rules to everyone for years... gee, I wonder what he will do this time...?
Trust the Government.... Oh yeah. Like they are sooo trustworthy.