|
Post by kevin1 on Jun 3, 2006 8:51:02 GMT -5
I'm going to do multiple methods , drag line , scent bomb . foliage spray , trunk spraying , dripper , etc . I'm hanging the trail cam today to observe dripper and drag line results , pics to be posted later .
|
|
|
Post by BIGHORN on Jun 3, 2006 20:19:20 GMT -5
I sent an E-mail stating I would like to try it but never even received a return e-mail !!!!!
Shawn
|
|
|
Post by Woody Williams on Jun 3, 2006 21:38:47 GMT -5
I sent an E-mail stating I would like to try it but never even received a return e-mail !!!!! Shawn This was posted on a lot of forums. He might have got more people requesting it than he had bottles of the stuff. If it is edible attractant it wont do Indiana folks much good. At least for hunting.
|
|
|
Post by kevin1 on Jun 6, 2006 14:34:25 GMT -5
No results so far according to my game cam .
|
|
|
Post by indianahick on Jun 7, 2006 8:47:11 GMT -5
Wonder if this stuff is similar to that stuff that Hank Parker was peddeling on television last fall?
|
|
|
Post by dec on Jun 7, 2006 10:19:28 GMT -5
Mine arrived last night. I'll put it out this weekend and put my trail camera over it.
|
|
|
Post by daworz on Jun 8, 2006 16:27:22 GMT -5
Got mine the other day, wounder what the shelf life would be, or can you put in the frig?
|
|
|
Post by kevin1 on Jun 9, 2006 19:59:30 GMT -5
I've just sent a pic of nothing but yard and advised our benefactor that the results to date have been disappointing . In fact , I advised him that I've gotten far better results from a used tampon(which is true) . So far I'm not impressed , but the bottle is far from empty . Next comes the drag , dripper , and more remotely placed scent pads . Film at 11 .
|
|
|
Post by huxbux on Jun 9, 2006 20:16:28 GMT -5
Nothing here yet, either.
|
|
|
Post by huxbux on Jun 11, 2006 10:53:27 GMT -5
Checked the area this morning where I had put down the attractant. ( I put down according to Jerry's recommendation) Although I don't have a trailcam, I can attest to the fact that they walked literally right over it since the last rain and did not pay it any mind whatsoever.
|
|
|
Post by huxbux on Jun 19, 2006 20:36:48 GMT -5
I've had no luck at all with this. Deer here walk over it without stopping. Anyone had any hits on theirs?
|
|
|
Post by kevin1 on Jun 20, 2006 5:52:24 GMT -5
Not a single pic on my game cam other than shots of me checking the test area .
|
|
|
Post by Woody Williams on Jul 13, 2006 22:21:13 GMT -5
From another site...
Hi everyone. My name is Jerry Bailey with Brothers Research Corp. in Burlington North Carolina. I have been a research chemist for over 30 years. I just started working on these deer attractant formulas last year. We launched this testing program to determine what would work year round to attract the deer. Most of these formulas we starting testing in the summer of last year with a lot of success here in North Carolina. What we found was as we drew closer to the cooler weather the deer responded to these even more. To relate to you what our company does we are the makers of the Duragloss Car Care Products that are sold around the country at your local Carquest and at some NAPA stores. You are probably wondering why i am working on deer attractants, well thats a long story. From narowing down the spectrum of formulas so far it looks like formula 61506A is getting a lot of positive reviews. Many people have had good success attracting the deer in by spraying on a small section of their clover plots. If you have not received your sample please let me know. I would prefer that you have a camera setup so you can share your results and pics with the other members of the forum. Thanks so much to everyone and i look forward working with some of you. Naturally we can't get samples for everyone because of the cost involved in this research project has already went over our projected budget.
God Bless you all.
Jerry 800-638-7245.
My email is gloss1@earthlink.net
|
|
|
Post by huxbux on Jul 13, 2006 22:41:30 GMT -5
I just E-mailed Jerry with the disappointing results of the sample he sent me. It was NOT the sample he reported having good results with in Woody's post. It was #121605.5
|
|