|
Post by duff on Dec 29, 2005 8:52:16 GMT -5
After reading on here a few people said the license money went to the State's general fund I wanted to find out if that was the case. I asked another guy who is deeply involved with the DNR and very informed on hunting laws.
If I get his permission to copy his reply to me I will, but in short, all license fees are dedicated to the Fish and Wildlife department of the DNR. The only way it can be used outside of this section is for habitat improvements to the DNR reservoir property and DNR owned nature preserves. Now the F&W budget has to be approved by the elected officials and they can deny spending even when this money can not be spent in other areas of the state.
So our hunting/fishing/trapping license money is not used for general funds.
|
|
|
Post by duff on Dec 29, 2005 9:03:04 GMT -5
www.in.gov/legislative/ic/code/title14/ar22/ch12.pdfThis is the IAC on hunting, fishing, and trapping license, the last point is where all license money is deposited. Edited to add this IC 14-22-12-15 Deposits in Fish and Wildlife Fund Sec. 15. All license fees shall be deposited into the fish and wildlife fund. As added by P.L.1-1995.SEC.15.
|
|
|
Post by duff on Dec 29, 2005 9:18:07 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by jackc99 on Dec 29, 2005 10:56:41 GMT -5
duff - one thing to keep in mind is that license fees alone are not enough to fund DNR. Their budget depends on monies that come from the legislature (i.e. general fund). In the end the DNR and us depend on everyone in the state to help fund our fun and games. All of the sudden $24 for a deer tag doesn't sound too bad does it?
By the way the bird watchers, leaf lookers and hikers who roam the woods don't pay a penny (unless they pay an entrance fee to a state park) but at the same time they don't have much of say down at DNR which is a good thing. There is talk of charging them a license fee which most of them are willing to pay but of course they want some say in how DNR is run which is a bad thing.
Jack
|
|