|
|
Post by Woody Williams on Mar 27, 2006 12:10:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by chicobrownbear on Mar 27, 2006 12:25:03 GMT -5
Thunderstruck.
|
|
|
|
Post by duff on Mar 27, 2006 14:56:51 GMT -5
Wow
|
|
|
|
Post by shootsa410 on Mar 27, 2006 16:54:17 GMT -5
Good thing he didn't kill it with a 410. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by 911 on Mar 27, 2006 19:52:19 GMT -5
Dirt Deeds Done Dirt Cheap |
|
|
|
Post by shinglemonkey on Mar 27, 2006 21:32:51 GMT -5
Big Balls
|
|
|
|
Post by DEERTRACKS on Mar 28, 2006 9:28:26 GMT -5
Must have been the AC / DC music comming from his i-pod.  Nice buck! |
|
|
|
Post by 911 on Mar 28, 2006 18:29:26 GMT -5
This was the big buck that was killed in Decatur county last season. Apparantely the guy was drinking mountain dew and eating peanuts when the big boy showed up.
|
|
|
|
Post by Woody Williams on Mar 28, 2006 18:39:48 GMT -5
Apparantely the guy was drinking mountain dew and eating peanuts when the big boy showed up. So THAT is the secret. Here I've been drinking Diet dew and eating M & Ms.. |
|
|
|
Post by Indyhunter on Mar 28, 2006 19:33:19 GMT -5
Definitely a nice deer. Not sure why they felt the need to make sure everyone knew it was a 20ga though. 20 will take down a deer as fast as a 12.
|
|
|
|
Post by 911 on Mar 28, 2006 20:56:41 GMT -5
Thats true first two deer i killed were with a 20 and they both dropped in their tracks.
|
|
|
|
Post by lymanl3 on Mar 28, 2006 22:35:33 GMT -5
Definitely a nice deer. Not sure why they felt the need to make sure everyone knew it was a 20ga though. 20 will take down a deer as fast as a 12. I totally agree! Recently there was a debate over the use of 20 gauge slug to kill deer...i.e, the contrary was that it was not enough to take a deer. I for one, totally disagree. I have killed many deer with a 20 gauge single shot when I was young. I would rather use that than a rifle..imo...its shot placement. FYI...see the new proposed bill re: rifles? Lyman |
|
|
|
Post by Woody Williams on Mar 29, 2006 6:54:21 GMT -5
The 20 guage is MORE than adequate for taking deer sized animals. Even big bruisers like this one.
Now the arguement would really come into play with the lowly .410...
|
|
|
|
Post by RJ on Mar 29, 2006 19:40:30 GMT -5
Man ... that's a monster !
|
|
|
|
Post by ridgerunner on Mar 29, 2006 19:48:56 GMT -5
.....What's that noise outside your window, ...whats that shadow on the blind?......Somewhere a clock strikes midnight.. and a chill runs down my spine.......No one's gonna warn ya, ..no one's gonna yell attack,....I give my left arm.. to get a shot at a buck like that!.......I couldn't resist . Ridgerunner
|
|
|
|
Post by indianahick on Apr 2, 2006 0:48:24 GMT -5
I took several deer with a 20 ga. The only reason I went to a 12 was because they had a rifled barrels and I could not get one for my Ithaca. So I bought a Mossberg 12 with a rifled barrel. It was and still is a great gun although I usually use a Knight now.
|
|
|
|
Post by pbr on Apr 2, 2006 13:18:07 GMT -5
A 20 is good..
A .410 PFFFTTT!!
|
|
|
|
Post by mikeweiler on Apr 6, 2006 7:58:03 GMT -5
I don't know about the .410 thing. My son (who's now 9) killed his first buck with a .410 2 years ago at the age of 7. The 20 gauge was still too strong for him then. He made a perfect lung shot a 45 yards. The buck only ran 20 yards before piling up in a creek. I was however there with my muzzleloader in case.
Mike
|
|
|
|
Post by dlawrence on Apr 6, 2006 21:42:07 GMT -5
Shoot the 20 guage Lightfield slugs.
|
|
|
|
Post by polypros on Apr 24, 2006 10:57:30 GMT -5
Nice buck but needs one more year of development.
|
|
