|
Post by hornharvester on Sept 28, 2006 20:45:33 GMT -5
WW or someone else please explain this rule that i copied from the dnr website pertaining to urban deer hunting.
SECTION 2. 312 IAC 9-3-5 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: 312 IAC 9-3-5 Hunting deer by bow and arrows by authority of an extra deer license Authority: IC 14-22-2-6 Affected: IC 14-22-11-1; IC 14-22-12-1 Sec. 5. (a) This section is supplemental to section 2 of this rule and governs the activities of an individual who is either: 3 (1) issued a license to take an extra deer under IC 14-22-12-1(18), or IC 14-22-12-1(19), IC 14-22-12- 1(24), or IC 14-22-12-7 by means of a bow and arrows; or (2) hunting under IC 14-22-11-1 with an extra deer license by means of a bow and arrows. (b) Except as specified in subsection (d), the statewide seasonal limit for hunting under this section is one (1) deer of either sex. After August 31, 2007, a person must not take an antlered deer by means of a crossbow. (c) The restrictions contained in section 4(b) and 4(e) through 4(i) of this rule also apply to a license issued under this section. (d) The seasonal limit for hunting deer in an urban deer zone is four (4) deer of which only one (1) may be antlered. A person must possess a valid extra deer license for each deer taken. A deer taken under this subsection does not count against a bag limit for deer set elsewhere in this rule.
What is the reason behind this rule. h.h.
|
|
|
Post by strelnikov on Sept 28, 2006 21:48:02 GMT -5
Probably the same stupid reason you can't shoot carp or other undesirable/invasive fish with a crossbow in Indiana but can take them with almost any other means. Apparently the anti-crossbow movement was strong enough in Indiana at the time the legislation was passed to legislate them out of the picture.
Hopefully the increasing popularity and economic impact of crossbow users will change this .. but I wouldn't hold your breath after talking to a few folks. It's not real high on their priority list.
|
|
|
Post by DaWG on Oct 15, 2006 17:28:16 GMT -5
HH
I personally hunt with a crossbow in the urban zone. I hunt with it because I have had a shoulder and wrist injury. I have the handicap hunters permit to use it.
Beyond this did you ever find an answer to your question?
DaWG
|
|
|
Post by Woody Williams on Oct 15, 2006 18:18:50 GMT -5
First off let me apologize for missing your post. Sorry.
This does not pertain just to the Urban Deer Zones. It is statewide.
The answer is:
Back a few years ago the IDNR proposed to the NRC that non-handicapped crossbowers could take an antlered deer during the late archery season. that was great. Finally treating crossbow hunters as equals.
One of the reasons givin, although it is not the main reason, was that since a deer hunter could only take one buck under the OBR trial what difference did it make which hunting tool he used?
After the preliminary hearing the IBA and the IDHA met with John Goss, who was the DNR director at that time, and pleaded that people were confused that this was tied in with the OBR trial so not a whole lot of folks spoke out against it.
I was assured at that time that it was not tied in any way to the OBR.
John Goss relented and had the proposal modified to have the late season crossbow buck sunset at the same time as the OBR. I pleaded the crossbower's case at the final adoption meeting, but it fell on deaf ears. Glen Lange at that time said it was a "trial".
Therefore if it is not adopted fully the late season crossbow buck for non-handicapped deer hunters will sunset on August 31, 2007. The same date as the OBR is it was not renewed.
A non-handicapped crossbower can take an anterled deer statewide IF he/she has not filled his/her buck tag in a previous season.
Now, if we want to keep that we need to contact the DNR and the NRC to let them know. You may bet your first born that I will do just that.
.
|
|
|
Post by hornharvester on Oct 15, 2006 21:34:19 GMT -5
Small self-interest groups at their finest again! Its a real shame that we have to put up with such a bunch of whiners as these groups. h.h.
|
|
|
Post by pbr on Oct 17, 2006 9:37:18 GMT -5
Bummer.
Why would the IDHA be against such a thing? Aren't they supposed to be supporting deer hunters?
Why should the IBA have input on bag limits in another weapon's season?
|
|