|
|
Post by hunter480 on Jul 23, 2006 16:47:03 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by DEERTRACKS on Jul 24, 2006 7:58:48 GMT -5
Dandy!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by hoosier on Jul 24, 2006 20:57:19 GMT -5
Hes a stud for sure...please post more as you get them.
|
|
|
|
Post by eelriver on Jul 25, 2006 6:15:45 GMT -5
Very nice deer, good solid body, plenty of mass. If we're lucky he'll head to Clay County by October.
|
|
|
|
Post by hunter480 on Aug 11, 2006 21:20:27 GMT -5
Hes a stud for sure...please post more as you get them. As requested  |
|
|
|
Post by hoosierhuntinful on Aug 12, 2006 9:01:34 GMT -5
nice buck.hard to tell if he is a 2 or 3 y/o buck.got a droop to his belly but no sag to his back and his legs look long.id say a very impressive 2 y/o
|
|
|
|
Post by jstalljon on Aug 14, 2006 7:04:56 GMT -5
I can get rid of that cull buck for you h480....I mean seriously, that split G2 on his left side is REALLY an EYE SORE....
I'd be willing to remove that genetic freak from your herd for you! ;D At NO charge to you either. ( I'm a giver )
|
|
|
|
Post by hunter480 on Aug 17, 2006 17:26:03 GMT -5
nice buck.hard to tell if he is a 2 or 3 y/o buck.got a droop to his belly but no sag to his back and his legs look long.id say a very impressive 2 y/o I`m not an expert at estimating deer age, although I do know to look at the belly, and I`ve heard about the sag in the back, but I can`t help but believe this is older than a 2 ½ year old. Anyone have experience with older deer that could offer their input? |
|
|
|
Post by danf on Aug 18, 2006 15:00:35 GMT -5
Greg- I'll come shoot it for you and then you can get it aged. ;D Whereabouts (roughly) is this buck? Township is all I need to know!  |
|
|
|
Post by ridgerunner on Sept 2, 2006 7:29:13 GMT -5
I'm gonna say 3 year old deer. Born late 2003.
|
|
|
|
Post by hunter480 on Sept 2, 2006 8:42:59 GMT -5
I'm gonna say 3 year old deer. Born late 2003.  ? By "late" 2003 you mean June, right? Which, if correct would put him at 3 1/2. |
|
|
|
Post by swilk on Oct 27, 2006 17:07:22 GMT -5
I would say 4.5.
Paunch belly, defined brisket .... but the telltale is the length of the body.
Tell ya what, kill him then we will see who is correct.
|
|
|
|
Post by hunter480 on Oct 27, 2006 19:03:54 GMT -5
I would say 4.5. Paunch belly, defined brisket .... but the telltale is the length of the body. Tell ya what, kill him then we will see who is correct. I sure hope I can do just that-put him on the ground and check the teeth, to hopefully, get a close determination of the age. He is a stud. |
|
|
|
Post by Woody Williams on Oct 27, 2006 19:08:33 GMT -5
4 1/2....
|
|
|
|
Post by hunter480 on Oct 27, 2006 19:31:17 GMT -5
Sweeeeeet-THAT`s more like what I was thinking.  |
|
|
|
Post by hoyt1166 on Oct 27, 2006 19:37:37 GMT -5
He's not a 2.5 yo but whether he's 3.5 or 4.5, hard to say. My guess would be 3.5 but purely a guess without looking at the teeth
|
|
|
|
Post by LawrenceCoBowhunter on Oct 27, 2006 20:48:46 GMT -5
I would say he's every bit a 4.5 yo
|
|
|
|
Post by pbr on Oct 28, 2006 8:29:59 GMT -5
3.5 or 4.5 or 5.5 - it doesn't matter.
He is a SHOOTER.
|
|
