|
Post by bullseye69 on Feb 29, 2016 19:35:18 GMT -5
Just use one of these and you won't need a HPR. But you may need a doctor. hahahahahahahahaha
|
|
|
Post by dbd870 on Mar 1, 2016 8:02:18 GMT -5
And people wonder why this country is such a mess - because these are the kind of clowns running everything.
|
|
|
Post by drs on Mar 1, 2016 10:04:14 GMT -5
Ok. It just got amended and even I am confused. As I heard it it places a 10 round limit on cartridges in the gun; it removes the 10' elevated stand requirement;the rule sunsets after 4 years....this was one amendment which passed. Second amendment was for STATE land only!!!! also passed 3rd amendment was adding the .40 caliber but there is confusion as to pistol barrel length...up to 18" anyway it also passed.It's really a mess now.Jack Sure sounds like it, Jack!! I would consider an 18" barrel length ruling on handguns (per the 3rd amendment) would make them more of a carbine instead of a pistol.
|
|
|
Post by drs on Mar 1, 2016 10:07:37 GMT -5
And people wonder why this country is such a mess - because these are the kind of clowns running everything. ......And it will only get worse. Seems like no one is on-the-same-page, regarding rulings or explaining anything to do with this issue of High Powered rifles.
|
|
|
Post by whitetaildave24 on Mar 1, 2016 13:33:02 GMT -5
It just passed senate 26-24.
|
|
|
Post by drs on Mar 1, 2016 13:57:53 GMT -5
It just passed senate 26-24. Thanks for the up-date.
|
|
|
Post by hornzilla on Mar 1, 2016 14:05:56 GMT -5
So what's the full details of it? State wide?
|
|
|
Post by whitetaildave24 on Mar 1, 2016 14:29:43 GMT -5
As far as I know. Still only southern part of state, but only on state land. Also no 10' elevation and a 10 round max capacity.
|
|
|
Post by jjas on Mar 1, 2016 14:52:10 GMT -5
What a screwed up mess this thing has turned into....
|
|
|
Post by M4Madness on Mar 1, 2016 16:54:43 GMT -5
I just told a buddy who is surrounded by state ground about the bill passing, and that everyone will be "lightin' 'em up" around his place. He replied that the outlaws hunting around him on state ground have been using HPR's for years. Lol!
|
|
|
Post by swetz on Mar 1, 2016 18:10:42 GMT -5
That's crazy. So I can't hunt my own land with an HPR, but I can on state owned land? I don't get that at all.
|
|
|
Post by M4Madness on Mar 1, 2016 18:37:01 GMT -5
That's crazy. So I can't hunt my own land with an HPR, but I can on state owned land? I don't get that at all. I'd venture to guess that changing it from private to state land was a failed bill killer. If so, I bet the author of that amendment Senator Hershman is regretting it about now. Lol! And to top it off, his district is in northern Indiana where HPR's would still be prohibited.
|
|
|
Post by hornzilla on Mar 1, 2016 18:57:09 GMT -5
So will it be public land only? Or could council adjust it for private also?
|
|
|
Post by M4Madness on Mar 1, 2016 19:00:30 GMT -5
So will it be public land only? Or could council adjust it for private also? Oh, it can most certainly be changed back to private (or added to public) in the conference committee.
|
|
|
Post by firstwd on Mar 1, 2016 19:05:14 GMT -5
That's crazy. So I can't hunt my own land with an HPR, but I can on state owned land? I don't get that at all. I'd venture to guess that changing it from private to state land was a failed bill killer. If so, I bet the author of that amendment Senator Hershman is regretting it about now. Lol! And to top it off, his district is in northern Indiana where HPR's would still be prohibited. Maybe that was his way of making sure his constituents have a chance to participate too.
|
|
|
Post by M4Madness on Mar 1, 2016 19:10:38 GMT -5
I'd venture to guess that changing it from private to state land was a failed bill killer. If so, I bet the author of that amendment Senator Hershman is regretting it about now. Lol! And to top it off, his district is in northern Indiana where HPR's would still be prohibited. Maybe that was his way of making sure his constituents have a chance to participate too. His constituents were excluded as soon as the Senate Natural Resources Committee amended the bill to include the north/South boundary. Changing the bill from private to public didn't affect them at all, unless they travel to southern Indiana to hunt the HNF. And even then, simply ADDING public to private would have been the logical solution.
|
|
|
Post by js2397 on Mar 1, 2016 19:17:00 GMT -5
HNF won't allow HPRs, it is for state owned land only.
|
|
|
Post by firstwd on Mar 1, 2016 19:19:45 GMT -5
HNF won't allow HPRs, it is for state owned land only. And then the property manager has the final say if they will be allowed or not.
|
|
|
Post by M4Madness on Mar 1, 2016 19:29:36 GMT -5
HNF won't allow HPRs, it is for state owned land only. I don't hunt there, but have always called it state ground. I guess it really is federal, correct?
|
|
|
Post by js2397 on Mar 1, 2016 19:32:34 GMT -5
HNF won't allow HPRs, it is for state owned land only. I don't hunt there, but have always called it state ground. I guess it really is federal, correct? I am pretty sure it's federal land, and the bill says state owned. I'm not 100 percent on that though. www.fs.usda.gov/hoosier/
|
|