|
|
Post by drs on Dec 6, 2014 9:04:36 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by dbd870 on Dec 6, 2014 10:31:11 GMT -5
No way I'd send one back to that company at this point. I would replace the trigger first if I had any concerns. This could be good news for Timney etc.
|
|
|
|
Post by drs on Dec 6, 2014 10:33:57 GMT -5
No way I'd send one back to that company at this point. I would replace the trigger first if I had any concerns. This could be good news for Timney etc. I agree |
|
|
|
Post by jjas on Dec 7, 2014 0:28:00 GMT -5
Whether this is a matter of CYA (cover your ***) from Remington's attorneys or there truly is an issue, the fact that they (Remington) are doing this makes them look guilty. Throw in the recall from the newer X-Mark Protriggers on the model 7 and 700 rifles (manufactured from May 1, 2006 to April 9, 2014) (not to mention the problems they had with the 105cti, versamax and 887 shotguns) and Remington has a financial and public relations nightmare on their hands.
|
|
|
|
Post by esshup on Dec 7, 2014 2:37:03 GMT -5
Remingtons QC has tanked recently. The local gunsmith has repaired 3 brand new 870's that had a shell jamb in the chamber after they were fired. First shell fired in the gun. There was a ridge left in the chamber which allowed the brass base to expand during firing, effectively locking the spent shell in the chamber. Oops!!!
I wouldn't sent it back either, I'd fix it myself.
|
|
