|
Post by Genesis 27:3 on Jul 21, 2013 16:51:21 GMT -5
I have read several articles lately about removing a bow grip so that your hand comes into direct contact with the bow frame and causing less torque. Anyone ever try this? I know for awhile now PSE has came out with bows that do not have a grip (such as the Mathews and other brands) but never knew why. Maybe they're onto something? I got to looking at the grip on my Mission Venture and noticed that it isn't even screwed on! Just has a little glue. And I also noticed that it comes off really easy and does slightly twist a little. And we all know that a little twist at the bow can equal several inches at the target. I am going to give it a whirl and see what happens. If it tightens up my group then I will be sold!
|
|
|
Post by trapperdave on Jul 22, 2013 15:10:37 GMT -5
if youre not grabbing/clenching the bow it wont torque to start with. shoot with a relaxed bow hand, neither gripping the bow nor forcing the hand open.
|
|
|
Post by Genesis 27:3 on Jul 22, 2013 20:57:52 GMT -5
Tried taking my grip off today and didn't see a difference. I usually don't have a problem with torque but I found the articles interesting so I figured I'd give it a try.
|
|
|
Post by Russ Koon on Jul 23, 2013 11:42:02 GMT -5
I did that on a couple of my Browning compounds several years back. Helped me to get used to the feel of settling the grip in the right place on my bow hand, as I could feel the exact location of it better. After shooting without the grip for a season or two, I went back to it for the comfort, and didn't have the torque problems return, so it was a helpful experience for me.
A lot depends on your bow and your hand size, as well as your personal form issues.
Quite a few guys seem to benefit from going to thinner aftermarket grips for their Mathews bows, and one Mathews I owned had the grip reworked for a slimmer and less torque-sensitive feel. I'm 5' 9" with about average sized hands for my height. A friend who also shoots Mathews is slightly shorter and has some torque issues, although he overcomes them well with good form when he's practiced up. My relatives who are 6' plus seem to not have the issues, so hand size seems to be a factor.
I would have to disagree with what trapperdave said above in one respect. Even with an open hand, the friction between the skin and the grip surface can impart a lot of torque into the bow. It can be difficult to find by feel and can be done in so consistent a manner that your groups will be good, until something happens to change that friction. One of the best ways to discover whether you are imparting torque due to such skin friction is to use a thin cotton glove or a lubricant such as WD-40 on the grip and try a couple shots normally. If the POI moves laterally to different point it's a good indication that you have been unknowingly torquing the riser.
Been there, done that....a couple of times. It can be sneaky because if you're making that form error very consistently in practice, nothing feels amiss and your results will be fine until that chilly day when you wear a glove or that rainy day when you try a shot with a wet grip. Better to find the form problem and fix it, then you will have the same POI under any circumstances. Sounds like from your own experiment with removing the grip, you probably have very little problem if any in that department. That's good. A few shots with some lube on the hand from time to time is a good way to be sure, though.
Like a lot of other shooting problems, some guys will encounter it, some won't, and some may occasionally. Good to be aware of the possibility so that it may be easier to detect and fix if ever needed.
|
|
|
Post by Genesis 27:3 on Jul 23, 2013 19:13:42 GMT -5
I appreciate the feed back Russ. I shot some more today without the grip. When they designed the bow I'm sure they didn't intend on it being shot without the grip therefore the frame itself is slightly uncomfortable as apossed to having the grip. My biggest issue of all is unstable arrow flight. Its not totally out of control but enough to notice during flight. And after impact the arrow is sometimes kind of angled. Tried moving my rest left to right to make an attempt at fixing it but still have quite solved the issue. I have blazer vanes on my arrows now and considered switching to a helical to help stabilize the arrow in flight. A lot to learn about bow shooting. Been at it for 5-6 years now and still feel wet behind the ears.
|
|
|
Post by tjmurf on Jul 23, 2013 22:42:58 GMT -5
Several years ago I built a swivel grip on my Mach11 target bow. It work real sweet.
|
|
|
Post by Genesis 27:3 on Jul 23, 2013 23:45:22 GMT -5
Hmmm....Never heard of that before
|
|
|
Post by kirch86 on Jul 25, 2013 8:18:54 GMT -5
In the july issue of field and stream, they had an article about different myths on accuracy in archery. It was 3 guys that shot a bunch of arrows comparing group size. They tested if they shot tighter groups with the grip removed among other things. 30 yards 3.05 with grip 2.43 without grip, 40 yards 3.88 with, 3.62 without, 60 yards 6.01 with, 4.98 without. In their conclusion they wrote: "Yes, absolutely. All three of us shot better without the grip. For me, the difference didn't show up until I stepped back to 60. But Brantley shot better across the board. And Bestul, testing the thickest grip of all - Matthews famously enormous hunk of walnut- shot a full inch better at 30, 40, and 60 after removing it"
As far as arrow flight, Have you paper tuned your bow? If you haven't done that I think it will really help you out. I made a paper tuning rig out of pvc and it really works out nicely.
|
|
|
Post by Genesis 27:3 on Jul 26, 2013 15:37:22 GMT -5
Never paper tuned it but that is going to be a weekend project. Looked up some ideas on how to build one so that is what I am going to do. I did read the article and it was one of the articles I was referring to. Still messing around with it and trying to decide which is better.
|
|