|
|
Post by Woody Williams on Aug 22, 2010 15:40:50 GMT -5
Do you support for the 2nd week of gun as antlerless?
Chad asked a group of hunters at the Sugar Ridge meeting if the gun seasons was left alone as to the start date and length would they support a plan for the second week of that gun season to be antlerless only.
Your thoughts?
|
|
|
|
Post by HuntMeister on Aug 22, 2010 15:56:37 GMT -5
So the first two weekends would remain either sex and then the second Monday of season would start the antlerless and it would run thru the end of season?
|
|
|
|
Post by steve46511 on Aug 22, 2010 16:06:36 GMT -5
DAng.......I gotta read slower......I about blew that one reading TOO FAST.
Is this WITH or without the currently proposed late Dec antlerless season?
|
|
|
|
Post by hornharvester on Aug 22, 2010 16:53:11 GMT -5
The more I read and what I learned at the meetings the more I think this whole plan stinks of special interest groups trophy buck management plan.
I would not support the second week being antlerless for this reason. Leave the seasons the same and add hunting time, not subtract it. h.h.
|
|
|
|
Post by Woody Williams on Aug 22, 2010 17:22:48 GMT -5
So the first two weekends would remain either sex and then the second Monday of season would start the antlerless and it would run thru the end of season? yes.. |
|
|
|
Post by Woody Williams on Aug 22, 2010 17:25:23 GMT -5
DAng.......I gotta read slower......I about blew that one reading TOO FAST. Is this WITH or without the currently proposed late Dec antlerless season? Either way...this is independent of any other season.. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 22, 2010 17:53:47 GMT -5
Antlerless ONLY seasons want get the job done.....most hunters won't even be in the woods for them. Either sex days will kill just as many.
|
|
|
|
Post by deerman1 on Aug 22, 2010 18:05:28 GMT -5
No that is a win for the stake holders and compromise as I have stated prior there should be no compromise by the hunters of This state over these so called proposals ever it shows Apathy and weakness on our part . We deserve the right to hunt Bucks the entire gun season as well as doe deer!
|
|
|
|
Post by featherduster on Aug 22, 2010 18:11:04 GMT -5
I am with Hornharvester on this one.
|
|
|
|
Post by racktracker on Aug 22, 2010 19:20:03 GMT -5
Bow hunters would have the woods to themselves that second week and would be hunting bucks.
ATTENTION DNR - You need that buck carrot on the stick to get deer hunters in the woods where they can kill more deer - bucks and does.
Make a couple state parks does only hunting and see how many deer hunters you get to show up.
Scratch our backs (instead of the stakeholders)and we will scratch yours.
|
|
|
|
Post by js2397 on Aug 22, 2010 19:53:18 GMT -5
Three months ago yes, today no way.
|
|
|
|
Post by huxbux on Aug 22, 2010 20:24:34 GMT -5
The more I read and what I learned at the meetings the more I think this whole plan stinks of special interest groups trophy buck management plan. I would not support the second week being antlerless for this reason. Leave the seasons the same and add hunting time, not subtract it. h.h.  |
|
|
|
Post by tenring on Aug 22, 2010 20:32:14 GMT -5
NO!
|
|
|
|
Post by thecommissioner on Aug 23, 2010 3:47:30 GMT -5
The Christmas vacation doe season is a better idea.
|
|
|
|
Post by dbd870 on Aug 23, 2010 4:40:43 GMT -5
The more I read and what I learned at the meetings the more I think this whole plan stinks of special interest groups trophy buck management plan. I would not support the second week being antlerless for this reason. Leave the seasons the same and add hunting time, not subtract it. h.h. I agree. |
|
|
|
Post by maddog on Aug 23, 2010 7:05:16 GMT -5
Nope!
maddog
|
|
|
|
Post by tickman1961 on Aug 23, 2010 7:28:31 GMT -5
NO, would not even give it a thought....
Why not make every license purchased good for a buck or a doe. Many a buck only tag gets unfilled every year and the hunter has to purchase another tag to kill a doe. DNR needs to look at the license structure to attain their goals.
|
|
