|
|
Post by deerman on Jan 7, 2009 10:18:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier Hunter on Jan 7, 2009 18:29:00 GMT -5
229 acres for $2K looked decent. Only 40+ acres is woods though.
|
|
|
|
Post by drs on Jan 14, 2009 9:25:43 GMT -5
229 acres for $2K looked decent. Only 40+ acres is woods though. I agree. Not too much woodland or cover for Deer. Looks like it might offer some good Rabbit or Quail hunting though. |
|
|
|
Post by TagTeamHunter on Jan 20, 2009 14:38:13 GMT -5
wish it was closer ... 2k might be doable with a friend  |
|
|
|
Post by indianahick on Jan 21, 2009 12:48:35 GMT -5
Wooded cover is about average for what leases I have looked at. I have even seen some that say 100+ acre lease and when looking at picts you can tell that there are only 5 or 6 acres of actual wooded area.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 10, 2010 13:19:06 GMT -5
some of the biggest bucks killed are killed on properties just like this. just because there are only 5 acres of woods dont mean they arent there. it only takes about a 5 foot by 3 foot section for a big buck to hide in.
|
|
|
|
Post by Decatur on Jan 10, 2010 13:42:28 GMT -5
There are only 6 leases on that whole site, all in Michigan.
|
|
