|
|
Post by parson on Nov 12, 2019 12:13:23 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Woody Williams on Nov 12, 2019 13:42:48 GMT -5
I saw that and couldn’t believe it..
This is like being able to sue a car manufacturer if a drumk driver kills your family. Doesn’t make sense at all..
|
|
|
|
Post by Woody Williams on Nov 12, 2019 13:43:21 GMT -5
BTW - how did the individual judges vote?
|
|
|
|
Post by parson on Nov 12, 2019 15:03:54 GMT -5
Haven't seen any particulars on individual votes. But such silliness does not bode well for gun rights.
|
|
|
|
Post by jjas on Nov 12, 2019 15:04:11 GMT -5
I saw that and couldn’t believe it.. This is like being able to sue a car manufacturer if a drumk driver kills your family. Doesn’t make sense at all.. Not only that, but the shooter killed his mother and stole her legally owned firearm to kill those children. How can that be Remington's fault? BTW, I can't find how the justices voted, but if this is a "conservative" leaning court, I'd hate to see a liberal one. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 12, 2019 15:15:04 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by firstwd on Nov 12, 2019 16:23:18 GMT -5
Not sure there was a "vote" the court just didn't accept the case.
The argument is that Remington used marketing practices that are illegal (marketing a product for illegal purposes) in Connecticut. Basically SCOTUS declined to determine legal marketing practices. Now, the plaintiff has to prove that Remington actually marketed their product in a way contrary to Connecticut law.
|
|
|
|
Post by treetop on Nov 12, 2019 18:26:47 GMT -5
Hate being all gloom and doom but this is not good and for the life of me I can’t see how anybody could let this go through I’ve never seen a gun add that said here buy this and go kill someone.
Idk but this fill good everybody wins don’t say anything cause it may hurt somebody’s sexual preference or background sue someone cause your a idiot and on and on has got to change
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 12, 2019 18:42:35 GMT -5
Remington is protected per the 6th amendment.
|
|
|
|
Post by bartiks on Nov 12, 2019 20:06:21 GMT -5
You don't need a sledge hammer to break up a boulder, just need to chip away little by little. This is a slippery slope indeed.
|
|
