|
|
Post by Pinoc on Dec 19, 2015 9:44:59 GMT -5
Just making sure but if I still have a buck tag I can shoot a buck with archery equipment all the way to Jan 3 even though anterless season is in with firearms? Seems clear to me in regs but wanted to make sure. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
Post by Woody Williams on Dec 19, 2015 9:55:11 GMT -5
Yes you can . It is still archery season even when the "special antlerless season" comes in.
If you are hunting in a "deer reduction zone (old UDZ) you can hunt till he end of January.
|
|
|
|
Post by esshup on Dec 20, 2015 11:50:46 GMT -5
But I believe you still have to be fluorescent orange legal even while archery hunting because you are hunting while a firearm deer season is open.
|
|
|
|
Post by GS1 on Dec 20, 2015 11:58:38 GMT -5
But I believe you still have to be fluorescent orange legal even while archery hunting because you are hunting while a firearm deer season is open. Yes. Even if your county doesn't have an anterless season. |
|
|
|
Post by 3ptbuck on Dec 20, 2015 14:13:55 GMT -5
But I believe you still have to be fluorescent orange legal even while archery hunting because you are hunting while a firearm deer season is open. Yes. Even if your county doesn't have an anterless season. Well that's just stupid. |
|
|
|
Post by Woody Williams on Dec 20, 2015 14:26:18 GMT -5
Yes. Even if your county doesn't have an anterless season. Well that's just stupid. Agreed, we need to work on getting that changed.. |
|
|
|
Post by greghopper on Dec 20, 2015 14:35:52 GMT -5
Explain how it's stupid !!!! When the person gun hunting could be a few hundred yards away in the next county.... Or maybe even closer then that...
|
|
|
|
Post by GS1 on Dec 20, 2015 14:52:06 GMT -5
Explain how it's stupid !!!! When the person gun hunting could be a few hundred yards away in the next county.... Or maybe even closer then that... I hunt closer to Kentucky than the next County. Should I have it on when they have to wear it? Under most circumstances, it's stupid. |
|
|
|
Post by greghopper on Dec 20, 2015 15:01:20 GMT -5
Explain how it's stupid !!!! When the person gun hunting could be a few hundred yards away in the next county.... Or maybe even closer then that... I hunt closer to Kentucky than the next County. Should I have it on when they have to wear it? Under most circumstances, it's stupid. It only takes one circumstance to make it valid ! When did Hunter orange start scaring deer off or make a hunt less successful  |
|
|
|
Post by GS1 on Dec 20, 2015 15:27:19 GMT -5
Explain how it's stupid !!!! When the person gun hunting could be a few hundred yards away in the next county.... Or maybe even closer then that... Try again...I hunt closer to Kentucky than the next County. Should I have to wear it when they are required too? |
|
|
|
Post by greghopper on Dec 20, 2015 15:37:08 GMT -5
Explain how it's stupid !!!! When the person gun hunting could be a few hundred yards away in the next county.... Or maybe even closer then that... Try again...I hunt closer to Kentucky than the next County. Should I have to wear it when they are required too? Guessing you don't see the river as a buffer Zone??? <EDIT>As stated When did Hunter orange start scaring deer off or make a hunt less successful? |
|
|
|
Post by Woody Williams on Dec 20, 2015 15:50:51 GMT -5
Let's watch the "stupid" remarks...
|
|
|
|
Post by GS1 on Dec 20, 2015 15:59:45 GMT -5
Try again...I hunt closer to Kentucky than the next County. Should I have to wear it when they are required too? Guessing you don't see the river as a buffer Zone??? <EDIT> As stated When did Hunter orange start scaring deer off or make a hunt less successful? The river? It's never kept a bullet from traveling across it. I can hear their guns sometimes, so I'd say most HPR rounds could make it to me. One circumstance makes it valid? Really? There once was a guy who got a gun legally and shot a lot of people. Should we not be able to get one? Orange has zero effect on spooking deer, what does that have to do with unnecessary laws? |
|
|
|
Post by greghopper on Dec 20, 2015 16:07:36 GMT -5
So how many folks would have to DIE to make a rule valid for you?? SMH
When did Hunter orange start scaring deer off or make a hunt less successful ??
<EDIT>
|
|
|
|
Post by Woody Williams on Dec 20, 2015 16:20:04 GMT -5
One more time...
Stick to the subject and leave the "stupid" or insinuating remarks/questions out of it..
|
|
|
|
Post by 3ptbuck on Dec 20, 2015 16:27:05 GMT -5
Wow didn't see that coming from my remark. Still seems pretty silly. It's my own fault ofcourse but I would have been breaking the law if I went out again before reading this.
Hunting a county without the late season and on state ground that doesn't allow the use of bonus tags anyways, I NEVER would have imagined I'd need orange on to go bow hunt.
|
|
|
|
Post by GS1 on Dec 20, 2015 16:27:40 GMT -5
I like quoting myself to address questions that have already been addressed. See the orange spooking game portion of the answer? It's right below the question about one circumstance making something valid, that you missed. It's my opinion on the orange requirement. You don't have to agree and I couldn't care less who does. It's an opinion. Everyone has one. One circumstance makes it valid? Really? There once was a guy who got a gun legally and shot a lot of people. Should we not be able to get one? Orange has zero effect on spooking deer, what does that have to do with unnecessary laws? |
|
|
|
Post by greghopper on Dec 20, 2015 16:39:42 GMT -5
One more time... Stick to the subject and leave the "stupid" or insinuating remarks/questions out of it.. Ok..... Trying to understand why someone wouldn't want to wear orange when required!! Espicaly with it having no affect on Deer. BTW.... Sorry if someone took the remarks as directed at them!! |
|
|
|
Post by 36fan on Dec 20, 2015 16:44:37 GMT -5
Try again...I hunt closer to Kentucky than the next County. Should I have to wear it when they are required too? Guessing you don't see the river as a buffer Zone??? <EDIT>The north bank of the river was the state line between Indiana and Kentucky in 1792. Since the river banks are fluid and constantly changing, there is Kentucky land on the north side of the river now, and places that used to be Indiana land that is now underwater. ...and we won't ever get started on the Kentucky Bend down by Missouri and Tennessee. |
|
|
|
Post by greghopper on Dec 20, 2015 16:49:43 GMT -5
I like quoting myself to address questions that have already been addressed. See the orange spooking game portion of the answer? It's right below the question about one circumstance making something valid, that you missed. It's my opinion on the orange requirement. You don't have to agree and I couldn't care less who does. It's an opinion. Everyone has one. One circumstance makes it valid? Really? There once was a guy who got a gun legally and shot a lot of people. Should we not be able to get one? Orange has zero effect on spooking deer, what does that have to do with unnecessary laws? All good..... Where not going to see eye to eye on this subject .... Which is fine! #HardHeadedHooisers |
|
