|
Post by Woody Williams on Feb 11, 2013 17:21:06 GMT -5
Here is a response from Governor Mike Pence. Thank you for contacting me to express your support for gun rights. It was a pleasure to hear from you. We are in agreement that Congress and State law should support the constitutional right of law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms. On June 26, 2008, our nation was presented with a significant legal victory when the Supreme Court upheld what I believe was the true intent of our founding fathers by ruling in Heller v Districtof Columbia that the Second Amendment confers an individual right to handgun ownership for purposes of self-defense. In many ways, excessive gun control is as illogical as it is unconstitutional. Too much gun control can leave law-abiding citizens defenseless while doing very little to keep firearms out of the hands of criminals. After all, people who are deterred by laws against murder will not be deterred by laws that say you cannot have a gun. Under the belief that firearms in the hands of law-abiding citizens result in less, not more, crime, I will continue working to protect your constitutional right to gun ownership. I appreciate your input into this important matter and will keep your views in mind the next time that I am presented with legislation involving the rights of gun owners. Again, thank you for contacting me. It is an honor to serve as Governor and have the benefit of your advice. If you would like more information on this or any other issue, please visit my website at www.in.gov/gov. Sincerely, Mike Pence
|
|
|
Post by squirrelhunter on Feb 11, 2013 18:47:08 GMT -5
Good to hear.He's always been progun as far as I know.
|
|
|
Post by kevin1 on Feb 12, 2013 10:11:02 GMT -5
I got a reply from Donelly that said "I respect your right to bear arms, but...(Insert gun control)"
|
|
|
Post by squirrelhunter on Feb 13, 2013 14:31:21 GMT -5
I got a reply from Donelly that said "I respect your right to bear arms, but...(Insert gun control)" If I recall right the 1 I got from Donelly said he would vote against all new gun control. ![???](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/huh.png)
|
|
|
Post by Woody Williams on Feb 13, 2013 16:59:21 GMT -5
I got a reply from Donelly that said "I respect your right to bear arms, but...(Insert gun control)" If I recall right the 1 I got from Donelly said he would vote against all new gun control. ![???](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/huh.png) He said...The bold and underlined emphasis is mine. My bet is he will follow his leader and vote for a "universal back ground check."
|
|
|
Post by Russ Koon on Feb 14, 2013 13:17:26 GMT -5
That looks like where the real battle will take place.
That's where their argument seems most logical, and where our defenses are weakest.
The defense is still there, but it is a harder sell, because it depends on making the points that:
There will be unintended consequences in the prevention of otherwise law-abiding and responsible people being able to buy the weapons they need to defend themselves from criminal attack. There are about two million such defensive uses of firearms in private hands annually, and some of those will be prevented from happening if the background checks turn up some long ago diagnosis of depression or an arrest on a minor family dispute.
The INTENTION of preventing guns from falling into the hands of the wrong people may be fine, but actually PREVENTING it from happening will require more than good intentions. Most of the weaponry involved in the school shootings was obtained by other than legal means already, and 80% of the guns used in crimes are as well. Those intent on using weapons criminally will be unphased by the need to break another law in obtaining them.
Real political leadership would be seeking solutions that will ACTUALLY reduce the ease with which a maniac can access our children, and reduce their probability of completing their intended mayhem even if they do gain access...improved security of the physical premises, the presence of voluntarily armed trained personnel among the staff already inside the buildings.....instead of well- intended but unrealistic legislation that only hinders the law-abiding.
I suspect your prediction will be accurate. I'm still hopeful that he may prove to be a Democrat I could vote for, because I'm pretty tired of holding my nose while voting for Republicans in some of the races, or just skipping the ones where I can't stand the thought of supporting either side.
A guy who works on his own 13 yo Jeep can't be all bad, and he says the right stuff so far, so I'll continue to hope for the best and watch for his votes.
|
|