|
|
Post by rwtaxidermy on Jan 20, 2013 15:08:35 GMT -5
2 out of state deer hunters were busted in November with 3 deer (1buck-2doe) and neither hunter had purchased a license  ....after being busted one had purchased a license and killed another buck which he did lawfully check-in making his second antler kill of the season  . the landowner said these out of state guys had their court hearing two weeks ago and was slapped on the hand with a $300 fine each  . Apparently our courts are just as corrupt as our people in the white house......IMO these guys should be denied any type of hunting license in Indiana for at-least 5yrs and should have been fined at-least $500 each deer.....I'm done venting now!! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 20, 2013 16:32:39 GMT -5
You have a link....because you said at first that neither had a license, then you said one did? Might as well try to get the facts in order before we start slutting these guys up.
|
|
|
|
Post by greghopper on Jan 20, 2013 17:56:53 GMT -5
You have a link....because you said at first that neither had a license, then you said one did? Might as well try to get the facts in order before we start slutting these guys up. He said they had "NO" lic. then one guy got one after getting "BUSTED" and shot a legal buck.....is how I read it!!!! |
|
|
|
Post by whitetaildave24 on Jan 20, 2013 18:47:56 GMT -5
That's how I read it to Greg
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 20, 2013 18:53:10 GMT -5
Here's what he said ----> "2 out of state deer hunters were busted in November with 3 deer (1buck-2doe) and neither hunter had purchased a license .... after being busted one had purchased a license and killed another buck which he did lawfully check-in making his second antler kill of the season Unknown is when the one guy purchased the license and HOW he even wanted to after he was busted already? If he was the one who had killed the one buck without a license, then his second was not "lawfully checked" anyway. Too many unknowns here to make judgement that the Judge let these guys off the hook. |
|
|
|
Post by greghopper on Jan 20, 2013 19:06:24 GMT -5
Here's what he said ----> "2 out of state deer hunters were busted in November with 3 deer (1buck-2doe) and neither hunter had purchased a license .... after being busted one had purchased a license and killed another buck which he did lawfully check-in making his second antler kill of the season Unknown is when the one guy purchased the license and HOW he even wanted to after he was busted already? If he was the one who had killed the one buck without a license, then his second was not "lawfully checked" anyway. Too many unknowns here to make judgement that the Judge let these guys off the hook. Read the FIRST LINE in story, then your understand when someone got the LIC....... "2 out of state deer hunters were busted in November with 3 deer (1buck-2doe) and neither hunter had purchased a license" Looks clear to me.... |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 20, 2013 19:37:34 GMT -5
Yep, that part is clear, it's the rest of it that isn't. It say "after being busted one HAD purchased a license". When? before or after tyhe first deal? Then it say one of them killed another buck. How many deer did the other guy kill? Then he said he "lawfully" checked in the 2nd buck. Not possible. What charges did they face for all this? Got a link to the story or is this hearsay? |
|
|
|
Post by rwtaxidermy on Jan 20, 2013 21:57:07 GMT -5
Yep, that part is clear, it's the rest of it that isn't. It say "after being busted one HAD purchased a license". When? before or after tyhe first deal? Then it say one of them killed another buck. How many deer did the other guy kill? Then he said he "lawfully" checked in the 2nd buck. Not possible. What charges did they face for all this? Got a link to the story or is this hearsay? It's not rocket science. After both guys having being busted and cited by a local CO, one of the hunters {who had already admitted to killing the buck} purchased an out of state license and continued to hunt and killed another buck, the CO was notified when the hunter apparently used the on-line check-in to legally check in the deer on the license he had purchased. How the CO was informed of this action is beyond me. Both hunters appeared in court a few weeks back and were let off with a $300 fine......I really dont think the landowner they and I were hunting on is going to make up this story....there were many out of state hunters busted in Indiana this fall, not all made the papers. |
|
|
|
Post by parkerbow on Jan 21, 2013 19:07:24 GMT -5
Seemed pretty clear and understandable to me in the first post.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 21, 2013 19:57:14 GMT -5
Clear???. One hunter had multiple charges or should have, yet both were fined the same. It clearly says he "legally" or "lawfully" checked in a second buck, explain how that is clear to you?
|
|
|
|
Post by greghopper on Jan 21, 2013 20:31:33 GMT -5
 .....same movie different night 
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 21, 2013 20:36:34 GMT -5
Parts missing or unknown would be a better discription.
|
|
|
|
Post by johnc911 on Jan 22, 2013 8:23:16 GMT -5
No offense Timex but you seem to be the only one confused here.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 22, 2013 10:01:49 GMT -5
Im not confused. Im actually reading whats posted.
|
|
|
|
Post by Russ Koon on Jan 22, 2013 11:22:03 GMT -5
Ah, THERE'S your trouble!
The preferred method is to read part of the OP, make up your own conclusions as to the intended message, and respond to THAT.
The way you're doing it takes all the fun out of it and removes the possible variations in the game as it's played. If we all behaved that way, we'd be finished with the day's business before we finished our first cup of coffee! 8^)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 22, 2013 13:58:03 GMT -5
Again I dont have any trouble with the lynch mob mentality the OR wanted to form. Deer seasons over so everyone needs some sport.
The OR post appears to be based on hearsay from either the landowner or rw? Thats why there is no link. Thats clear. Its also clear that its aimed at NRs. Clearly.
Whats not clear is the charges on the two? Youd clearly think that both were charged the same, being they both had the same outcome. Its not clear how one fellow can kill at least two bucks both illegally and have the same fine as the fellow with the license viation. Being that all of this is based on hearsay, its hard to say what happened in the field or the courtroom. But dont let that stop the hanging, some guys have gotten it for less.
|
|
|
|
Post by Boilermaker on Jan 23, 2013 9:59:20 GMT -5
It's because you're a non-resident isn't it Timex...I don't think he was discriminating against all of "your people". He was just sharing a story he thought some would like to read about.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ahawkeye on Jan 23, 2013 13:34:21 GMT -5
Stirring the pot, I agree, Timex you're the only one not getting this.
|
|
|
|
Post by cambygsp on Jan 23, 2013 15:59:38 GMT -5
I agree too...... How could the court outcome be the same when there should be two sets of different charges?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2013 16:45:16 GMT -5
Atta boy Camby. At least one in state poster can actually read.
|
|
....after being busted one had purchased a license and killed another buck which he did lawfully check-in making his second antler kill of the season 
. the landowner said these out of state guys had their court hearing two weeks ago and was slapped on the hand with a $300 fine each 
. Apparently our courts are just as corrupt as our people in the white house......IMO these guys should be denied any type of hunting license in Indiana for at-least 5yrs and should have been fined at-least $500 each deer.....I'm done venting now!!
