|
Post by Woody Williams on Mar 6, 2008 9:21:46 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Hawkeye on Mar 6, 2008 9:33:53 GMT -5
Very informative!
|
|
|
Post by jkd on Mar 6, 2008 12:32:03 GMT -5
For immediate release: March 6, 2008
Hunters succeed in ’07 despite deer disease
Record reports of a viral disease affecting white-tailed deer seemed to have minimal impact on the 2007 hunting seasons in Indiana, as hunters harvested 124,427 deer.
“The big thing for me was that number,” said Chad Stewart, deer research biologist for the Indiana Department of Natural Resources. “We were guessing the harvest was going to be down a lot more than it was this year.”
Stewart provides details of the '07 season in an annual report that includes a county-by-county breakdown of the deer harvest. To obtain a complete copy of the report, go to dnr.IN.gov/press/2007_Deer_Season_Report.pdf
A widespread outbreak of Epizootic Hemorrhagic Disease (EHD), a viral disease transmitted by biting flies, had Stewart anticipating a significant drop from the 125,381 deer harvested in '06. Instead, hunters recorded the third-best season on record and were within 1,100 of the all-time mark of 125,526, set in 2005.
“That’s not to say (EHD) didn’t affect harvests in some parts of the state,” Stewart said. “The southwestern part of the state had a noticeable drop in harvest level, but that seems to have been made up elsewhere in the state.”
That “elsewhere” was primarily in the central and west-central areas of Indiana, especially in a handful of counties that experienced EHD in 2006.
“Where EHD affected counties like Clay, Fountain, Parke, Putnam, Sullivan and Vermillion in 2006, (numbers) all bounced back in a big way in 2007,” Stewart said. “In most cases, antlered harvests were back up to 2005 levels.”
Stewart said that’s potentially good news for such counties as Crawford, Daviess, Dubois, Knox, Martin, Pike, Spencer and Crawford, where harvest levels dropped at least 20 percent from '06. He said deer that survive EHD exhibit an immune response that can be passed on to their young, providing protection if the disease occurs the next year.
Other highlights of the '07 season included the success hunters had in harvesting female deer in the latter part of the firearms season and the muzzleloader season, which Stewart said plays an important role in controlling deer populations.
“Antlerless deer are shot at a 2-to-1 margin over the last nine days of the firearms season, and 80 percent of the harvest during the muzzleloader season is antlerless, with the majority of those being does,” Stewart said. “Without those efforts, the deer herds in some areas could rise dramatically.”
Steuben was the top county for the third straight year with hunters harvesting 3,754 deer. Switzerland County was second at 3,259, followed by Kosciusko (3,003), Franklin (2,950), and Marshall (2,854).
|
|
|
Post by indianahick on Mar 6, 2008 17:26:33 GMT -5
As a person that hunted Fairbanks on the Sullivan/Vigo county line area I believe that the EHD still had an impact upon the deer herd in that area. Just by going by how many deer I have seen there in the last two years compared to 3 or 4 years ago. Granted I was hunting private land primarily then and am switching from one to the other now. (Since I can legally now) But I am not only talking about the deer I have seen while hunting but doe groups that are moving about in other areas (private) when leaving for either the night or because of other obligations in the middle of the day. While it was better this year compared to last it has not restored back to 2004 or 5 population.
|
|
|
Post by cambygsp on Mar 6, 2008 17:32:35 GMT -5
page 9.....very interesting
|
|
|
Post by jajwrigh on Mar 6, 2008 18:08:30 GMT -5
Apparently PCRs were not a popular choice last year. I imagine that it will become more popular in time.
|
|
|
Post by dbd870 on Mar 6, 2008 18:40:32 GMT -5
Yep, most hunters aren't as serious as this bunch and they have their slug gun already - it's worked before, good enough. I suspect it will take many years.
|
|
|
Post by huxbux on Mar 6, 2008 20:56:43 GMT -5
I'm wondering how they collected the data on firearm type. I wasn't asked what I took a deer with at check-in.
|
|
|
Post by hornharvester on Mar 6, 2008 21:13:14 GMT -5
What surprises me is guys whine about using PCR, crossbows and high power handguns but they only make up 3% of the total harvest. h.h.
|
|
|
Post by lugnutz on Mar 6, 2008 21:54:32 GMT -5
I'm wondering how they collected the data on firearm type. I wasn't asked what I took a deer with at check-in. If we had telecheck we would have more accurate information, as they ask questions like that. Otherwise you have what we have now, a gestamation.
|
|
|
Post by indianahick on Mar 6, 2008 22:49:32 GMT -5
Where I check in my deer they ask every time you check in a deer during firearms and muzzle loading. Not during archery only of course. There is a space on the sheet for the firearm to be listed, if where some check in it is not asked then someone is not doing a complete job and more than likely putting down shotgun. Could be that they know you so well though that they know what you use and fill it in without asking too.
|
|
|
Post by DEERTRACKS on Mar 7, 2008 7:19:51 GMT -5
Some very interesting info.
|
|
|
Post by bullseye on Mar 10, 2008 10:28:51 GMT -5
Not sure how accurate they could record the PCR data. There was not a check box for them on the form at the check station. I told the lady I used a PCR and she said that was not an option. I looked at the form and sure enough, that was not an option to check.
|
|
|
Post by Sasquatch on Mar 10, 2008 14:01:06 GMT -5
I'm convinced that half the hunters had no idea you could even use PCR's. News travels slow outside of forums like this.
|
|
|
Post by huxbux on Mar 10, 2008 16:56:38 GMT -5
I'm convinced that half the hunters had no idea you could even use PCR's. News travels slow outside of forums like this. I ran across one who thought his .35 Rem. lever action was legal.
|
|
|
Post by jkd on Mar 10, 2008 17:59:37 GMT -5
bullseye - I think the problem was that the PCR rule came in after the state had already printed up the check-in forms for last season... I think IDNR sent out an info sheet to stations that they were supposed to hand-write in the PCR thing...
It'll be on there next year for sure...
|
|