|
|
Post by Woody Williams on Feb 14, 2009 21:04:28 GMT -5
Supposedly from the King Ranch.. This is making the inetrnet rounds again. I saw this a couple years ago and can't place it. Anyone remember it?  |
|
|
|
Post by Woody Williams on Feb 15, 2009 8:05:56 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Sasquatch on Feb 15, 2009 9:07:52 GMT -5
Even if someone tracked world records, why would they think that deer even approached 200 inches? Have they never seen a pic of the Hanson buck, or the Jordan buck? That deer is probably 160 total with the drop tines added in. Awesome deer, but not a world record. Gimme a break!
|
|
|
|
Post by swilk on Feb 15, 2009 14:33:35 GMT -5
IMO that deer is well north of 160" ..... without the drop tines. If the drop tines were counted it would flirt with 200".
|
|
|
|
Post by duff on Feb 15, 2009 14:37:36 GMT -5
It's the deer I have hanging in my office...oh wait I don't have an office. Must be in the shed someplace. It's one of my management bucks!
|
|
|
|
Post by steiny on Feb 15, 2009 14:56:37 GMT -5
I would agree with Swilk.
|
|
|
|
Post by Decatur on Feb 15, 2009 16:08:58 GMT -5
Ya, it's definately well over 160"!
|
|
|
|
Post by Woody Williams on Feb 15, 2009 16:39:00 GMT -5
This is an honest 201" buck..  Compare. Remember that the Texas or Mexico bucks are smaller bodied |
|
|
|
Post by scrub-buster on Feb 15, 2009 19:22:36 GMT -5
This is an honest 201" buck.. Compare. Remember that the Texas or Mexico bucks are smaller bodied If you put this rack on a texas buck, it would look like a 250" buck |
|
|
|
Post by trophyhunter1 on Feb 15, 2009 21:51:13 GMT -5
i got a 168 and that mulie makes him look like a yearling
|
|
|
|
Post by Sasquatch on Feb 16, 2009 0:00:18 GMT -5
This is an honest 201" buck.. Compare. Remember that the Texas or Mexico bucks are smaller bodied That's the measure I had in mind. The deer are much smaller bodied, and in this photo we got a dog for perspective. The texas deer is a whopper, but not even in the ball park of 200, even with two more drop tines than it has. |
|
|
|
Post by swilk on Feb 16, 2009 8:15:56 GMT -5
Just from a quick look....
8" G1's
12" G2's
10" G3's
8" G4's
27" main beams
20" inside spread
mass measurements worth 22" per side.
Add it up.
Maybe Im wrong but it looks like a mid to high 180's to me. Without the drop tines.
Woody, did the deer you pictured gross or net 201"? I think gross score vs gross score the original deer is within 10-15" of the second deer even without the drop tines.
|
|
|
|
Post by Woody Williams on Feb 16, 2009 8:38:12 GMT -5
That is net. 201 5/8" if I remember correctly. It is the Ohio record typical.
|
|
|
|
Post by tickman1961 on Feb 17, 2009 14:27:28 GMT -5
Nice Deer....
|
|
