|
Post by jim1966 on Nov 3, 2008 23:04:05 GMT -5
Decker buck Milo buck
|
|
|
Post by mullis56 on Nov 3, 2008 23:19:39 GMT -5
That phrase is used way to much IMO, there are a lot of big nice bucks, but world records don't live in every batch of woods every year...there is a guy on another board that saw the new world record typical and he lives on a 200 acre farm IL, what BS!!! That whole thing world record is over used IMO....not saying that they aren't bucks of a lifetime, etc., but they aren't world records!
|
|
|
Post by Ahawkeye on Nov 4, 2008 6:08:46 GMT -5
This deer is HUGE no doubt about it and anyone would be proud to have him in the back of the truck or on the wall but I think Milo's buck is bigger JMO.
|
|
|
Post by Sasquatch on Nov 4, 2008 6:46:23 GMT -5
The new deer has more total antler in all, IMO, but B&C rewards symmetry. The Hanson buck is the clear winner. The stickers alone would probably knock the Decker buck out of contention. I think it wins in the coolness department, however.
They should have both deer grow another year though, nyuck nyuck.
|
|
|
Post by dbd870 on Nov 4, 2008 7:14:18 GMT -5
It really doesn't matter to me.
|
|
|
Post by fullrut on Nov 4, 2008 9:11:47 GMT -5
NO, way too many deductions.
|
|
|
Post by HuntMeister on Nov 4, 2008 9:19:42 GMT -5
Milo buck without a doubt!
|
|
|
Post by swilk on Nov 4, 2008 9:48:29 GMT -5
They should have both deer grow another year though, nyuck nyuck. The funny thing is that the Decker buck is rumored to have been 3.5 years old. How much bigger could that thing have gotten?
|
|
|
Post by Old Ironsights on Nov 4, 2008 10:21:26 GMT -5
Can I use them as rattles? That's about all they mean to me.
|
|
|
Post by Woody Williams on Nov 27, 2008 13:39:56 GMT -5
More pictures (better too!)
|
|
|
Post by johnc911 on Nov 27, 2008 15:13:34 GMT -5
Not even close. Although the one with his head lying on the ground makes him look huge.
JOHNC911
|
|
|
Post by danf on Nov 27, 2008 18:33:18 GMT -5
Droopy ears! Droopy ears!!!! ;D ;D ;D ;D
Doesn't matter to me which one is the world record- I'd have pulled the trigger on either one if I was able to keep the shaking down!
|
|
|
Post by ridgerunner on Nov 27, 2008 18:36:18 GMT -5
Let the powers that be sort it out. Who cares? Their both tremedous deer any deer hunter would be tickeled sh****** to shoot. Why do we always need a debate?..I'd take either one!
|
|
|
Post by turk2di on Nov 28, 2008 10:04:04 GMT -5
I think the Milo buck is bigger. Not to close in my opinion, but im not a good guesser!
|
|
|
Post by tickman1961 on Nov 28, 2008 10:09:29 GMT -5
Hell of a deer anyone would be happy to have on the wall or see in the wild.....
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier Hunter on Nov 28, 2008 19:20:31 GMT -5
Don't even know why they used the words "Potential World Record" I'm sure he knows the green score by now but I've seen nothing. I guess he thinks he's keeping us all in suspense LOL
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier Hunter on Dec 31, 2008 10:30:18 GMT -5
Well its 60 days is about up. Haven't heard alot about this since the kill. Anybody care to guess how much he'll be short? I think it'll be quite alot.
|
|
|
Post by Sasquatch on Dec 31, 2008 17:20:30 GMT -5
In overall size he's bigger. But the wierd points mean he'll fall far short of the mark. ( as a B&C typical World record)
|
|
|
Post by powderfinger on Jan 1, 2009 12:31:53 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by steiny on Jan 1, 2009 15:12:16 GMT -5
Where did the Decker buck come from?
|
|