|
|
Post by chicobrownbear on Sept 5, 2008 0:40:13 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by dbd870 on Sept 5, 2008 4:03:55 GMT -5
There does need to be an air strike called in out there.
|
|
|
|
Post by kevin1 on Sept 5, 2008 5:00:04 GMT -5
Probably the most astute assessment of the situation of all the responses. Having lived in Kooki  ia myself for a number of years I can't honestly claim to be surprised when they venture into buffoonery. |
|
|
|
Post by Decatur on Sept 5, 2008 17:08:46 GMT -5
Crazy!
|
|
|
|
Post by drgreyhound on Sept 9, 2008 7:21:14 GMT -5
Makes no sense at all on California's part...
|
|
|
|
Post by 76chevy on Sept 9, 2008 7:48:23 GMT -5
sounds like a good stream of revenue to me!
the law belongs to the people though not the state government, so they should get the $
|
|
|
|
Post by Russ Koon on Sept 9, 2008 9:31:07 GMT -5
The people of the state paid for the making of the laws and for compiling them into book form and either printing them or making them available electronically. Why should they not be able to recoup their investment from the users? It could be supplied "free" to citizens of the state, since they have already paid for it, but that benefit would be supporting those who wanted their own copy at the expense of the taxpayers, and would be very difficult to restrict to citizens only.
Sounds to me like their solution is the most appropriate one.
I haven't tried to access the info on it, but I would assume that excerpts pertinent to the individual's legal questions are available either from the state or from other sources at minimal or no cost.
CA may do many things I don't agree with, but this time it sounds like they got it right.
|
|
|
|
Post by whitetaildave24 on Sept 9, 2008 9:40:47 GMT -5
Nothing that comes from that place surprised me anymore.
|
|
