Lead ban could cut off hunter's ammo

Taking Aim at Hunters' Ammo

By Matt Kettmann/Santa Barbara

Ever since the ancient Romans realized their plumbing was giving them gout,
lead has been bad news. The plentiful-but-toxic metal has been banned by the
federal government in everything from paint and water pipes to food
containers and gasoline. And now, one of the poisonous element's last
footholds in American culture - the ammunition used by the 25 million people
who hunt for sport and food - is being targeted, as states across the
country consider enacting bans on the use of lead for hunting.

The latest assault aims to protect the thousands of birds, wildlife and even
some endangered species that wildlife experts and activists claim die
annually from ingesting spent ammo that gets left in the mountains,
prairies, and forests where the hunted species thrive. As an alternative,
"get-the-lead-out" advocates want hunters to start using copper, bismuth,
tungsten, steel, tin, and other alloys in their bullets.

Some environmentalists claim they're also saving hunters from poisoning
themselves and others when they eat their lead-filled kills, and they are
hoping to make the ban nationwide, just as Canada did in 1999.

In 1991, the federal Fish and Wildlife Service banned lead ammo in waterfowl
hunting - that of ducks and other birds that live on water - which,
according to a FWS spokesperson, led to an estimated 64% reduction of lead
poisoning in ducks on certain parts of the Mississippi. The most recent
comprehensive state ban began on March 1 in Missouri, where state officials
realized lead buckshot was harming populations of mourning doves, turkeys,
quail, shorebirds and raptors. Several other states, including Washington,
Arizona, Texas, Ilinois and Virginia, are also considering lead bans.

Hunting is not the only sporting activity that's going unleaded: in 2004,
the Adirondack Cooperative Loon Program successfully lobbied New York State
to ban the sale of small lead fishing weights after studies showed ducks,
loons, and other waterfowl were mistakenly filling their gizzards with
lethal lead sinkers. Other anti-lead fishing regulations are also in place
in Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Vermont.

In California, the stakes are more specific, and considerably higher. There,
according to Paul Andreano of the "unleaded sportsman" organization Project
Gutpile and other wildlife experts, lead has caused the death of 13
California condors. Thirteen may not sound like a large number, but it is
for an endangered species whose population was down to a mere 22 in the
1980s and now, after two decades of capturing and breeding, still only
hovers at 279 individual birds. According to a recent U.C.-Santa Cruz study,
about one-third of 18 tested birds - easy victims because they are strictly
scavengers and therefore chow often on lead-laden carcasses and gutpiles
left over by hunters - had high levels of lead in their blood. Lead, says
Andreano, is perhaps the primary barrier to the species' recovery.

The Center for Biological Diversity recently sued the state, prompting the
California Department of Fish and Game to recommend to their decision-making
commission that lead should be banned in the condor's massive flying range,
which extends from roughly the San Francisco Bay Area south to Los Angeles.
The commission will likely vote on the decision this summer, but a large
swath of that land is already protected: in February, the state's largest
private landholding - the 270,000-acre Tejon Ranch, where numerous condors
can be found - banned hunting with lead shot. Not surprisingly, according to
a survey completed last month by the National Shooting Sports Foundation,
two-thirds of California hunters oppose the proposed state ban.

Environmentalists may not stop there. Says the Center's Jeff Miller, who
notes that bald and golden eagles are also being poisoned: "The last major
existence of lead in our environment is hunting and shooting.... After
securing the protection of condors in California, we're definitely going to
be looking at regulation nationwide."

It's not just endangered species that Andreano and Miller claim to be
worried about. They are seeking a national ban on lead ammo because they
believe - and some scientific studies suggest as well - that it also may be
poisoning people, especially children, who eat hunted meats. Says Andreano,
"There is such a problem with minute fragments of lead making their way onto
the hunters' dinner table that we feel, ultimately, this is a human health
and safety issue."

Hunters contend that the science behind lead's alleged threats to both
wildlife and humans is not yet conclusive and that educational and voluntary
compliance efforts should be pursued first. In any case, many of them don't
believe banning lead shot is the ultimate goal. As Jim Matthews, the editor
of the Outdoor News Service, notes, "Most hunters believe this is merely
another incremental step in an effort to ban hunting and/or firearms." Adds
the National Shooting Sports Foundation's Ted Novin, "I think it's certainly
possible that the gun-ban lobby and anti-hunting groups will use the
unwarranted fear of lead ammunition to help achieve their goal."

But beyond principle, the more practical complaint raised by hunters is that
the alternative ammo is too expensive. "Our primary issue is cost," says
Andrew Arulanandam, spokesman for the National Rifle Association, which has
opposed such moves in the past. Arulanandam and Novin also attempt to shoot
holes in the animal advocates' case with another argument. Lead, they claim,
is the best substance to use in ammunition because of it kills the prey "in
a more humane way." It's claim that is sure to trigger a new round of
crossfire in the battle over lead ammo.