|
Post by Woody Williams on Aug 16, 2005 15:18:40 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by kevin1 on Aug 16, 2005 16:14:24 GMT -5
It's already too dammed high , if ya ask me ! I work hand in hand with the transportation industry , and if you think your groceries are high now just keep watching . Five years ago it cost my company $3,000 to send a truckload of product to Los Angeles from Louisville , I just sent a paltry 14,000# load to the Bay Area this afternoon and it was $5,000 ! Gasoline isn't the only high cost fuel , and diesel prices directly impact everything we buy .
|
|
|
Post by bigugly on Aug 16, 2005 21:29:02 GMT -5
Well in Ontario we're paying around $1.00 per litre. Which puts us well over $4.00
|
|
|
Post by jh45gun on Aug 16, 2005 21:49:41 GMT -5
What ticks me off is that there is no shortage and they claim it is due to the refinerys operating at full capacity and the speculation of one goes down what bullcrap. With the profit these oil companies are making I am sure full capacity has been standard procedure for a while. No they are just gouging us. You know I saw a ad on TV tonite where GMC made a comment about their Hydrogen car who knows maybe this technology is coming along faster than we thought and the oil companies are hitting us in the pocket book so they can get more funds to develop this. Since they are in the Energy Business they sure are not going to let some one else get a head of them. Just a thought even if that is not the issue the gouging sure is.
|
|
|
Post by jajwrigh on Aug 16, 2005 22:03:55 GMT -5
Damn thats higher than Hawaii!!!! I was just there for my honeymoon and that place is expensive!! Its times like this I hate that my thirsty 4.3l.
|
|
|
Post by kevin1 on Aug 17, 2005 5:49:28 GMT -5
You know I saw a ad on TV tonite where GMC made a comment about their Hydrogen car who knows maybe this technology is coming along faster than we thought and the oil companies are hitting us in the pocket book so they can get more funds to develop this. Switching over to hydrogen fuel cell technology would require a complete restructuring of the US fuel dispensing infrastructure at a potential cost of billions , and guess who gets to pay for it ? That would just swap one leech for another . The obvious answer would be biodiesel , preferably from already well established hempseed oil . The infrastructure to dispense it already exists . The only motor fuel that cannot be made from hempseed oil , a vegetable form of petroleum , is gasoline since you can't distill benzene from it . It would also yield an inexhaustible supply of heating oil , jet fuel , lubricants , chemicals , plastics , and pretty much anything else we currently produce from oil . Hemp also produces the strongest natural fiber , and more pulp for paper acre for acre than trees . An added plus is that the very durable hemp plant can grow almost anywhere .
|
|
|
Post by duff on Aug 17, 2005 8:40:54 GMT -5
No matter how desperate we get, I don't see hemp being grown. Too much controversy.
Lets use corn and soybeans. I saw a news piece about 5 or 6 yrs ago that said the reason there isn't a bigger push for bio diesel is the instability of production. They claimed the surplus being produced isn't enough and a year of major drought or flooding accross most of the Mid west would skyrocket the fuel cost. They gave a dollar figure back then saying when gas reaches that point it will be a valid choice from that point on.
Who knows, maybe this will help shrink urban sprawl.
|
|
|
Post by kevin1 on Aug 17, 2005 9:05:45 GMT -5
Hemp is already in production , primarily for the fiber and edible oil , internationally . China , France , and several other nations have thriving hemp industries . I'm not suggesting that we buy from them , and considering that gasoline and diesel aren't getting any cheaper it's about time we looked into industrial(not recreational) hemp . This region used to be the largest hemp growing region in the country before nylon displaced hemp for rope making , there's no reason that it couldn't be again . Farmers that are currently growing tobacco could get more per acre with little changeover costs by switching to hemp . The strain of cannibis that is grown for fiber is totally useless for recreational purposes and would cross pollinate , and therefore ruin , any of the funny stuff growing anywhere near it .
Corn and soybeans aren't as viable as hemp for producing biodiesel due to much higher processing costs and higher water and fertilizer requirements . Hemp literally grows almost anywhere and requires far less care and feeding . So much for controversy .
|
|
|
Post by duster on Aug 17, 2005 12:12:37 GMT -5
Our neighbor to the north has been growing the industrial hemp for several years. The western border of Manitoba has thousands of acres growing in cooperation with the goverment.
|
|
|
Post by Woody Williams on Aug 17, 2005 13:03:18 GMT -5
ABC news report on US Oil Refineries Aug. 16, 2005 — There are 149 refineries in the United States, and the strain on them is showing. Months of operating at nearly full throttle — trying to satisfy record consumer demand — has produced a summer of fires, accidents and shutdowns.
"Refineries are strained, and they are having more accidents and creating worries about supply shortages that drive up the price," said Jamal Qureshi, an oil analyst with PFC Energy.
The system is so stretched that 10 percent of the nation's daily diet of gasoline must now be imported.
"Everybody has come to recognize in the last six to eight months that there is a significant shortage of refining capacity in this country," said Glenn McGinnis, chief executive officer of Arizona Clean Fuels.
Oil analysts say more refineries could make a difference in gas prices, especially if they were able to process what's called "heavy" crude.
Heavy crude is harder and more expensive to refine than "light" crude, but it's also $14 a barrel cheaper, and there are millions of barrels for sale.
But right now, less than a third of the nation's refining capacity uses heavy crude.
"The optimal scenario would be to build a lot more of these refineries that can process heavy crude," Qureshi said.
Would More Refineries Help?
Analysts say just a few new big refineries could produce enough extra gasoline to make a dent in prices. But building even a small refinery in the United States is a monumental task — just ask McGinnis.
He's been trying to build a refinery on a patch of Arizona desert for a decade, and at this point hopes to be operational in early 2010. It's taken five years to get the air quality permits — the site had to be moved from Phoenix to Yuma — and they still won't break ground for another year.
"By the time we're completed, it will have been 15 years since the project really got started until we got product to the market," McGinnis said.
|
|
|
Post by kevin1 on Aug 17, 2005 14:44:46 GMT -5
The average construction time for oil refineries is approx. 10 years , so that sounds plausible .
|
|
|
Post by steiny on Aug 17, 2005 18:55:49 GMT -5
Yet how many of us drive economy cars ? Aint hurting too bad yet.
In regards to those refineries, G.W. needs to step in and kick some of the regulations out of the way to allow construction of a few. A big one in the northwest would allow us to use our Alaska oil. Meawhile, it's all going to Japan.
|
|
|
Post by hoosier on Aug 19, 2005 1:28:21 GMT -5
I bet we will see a hydrogen car in the next 200 years. MAYBE!!! Too much money in oil for those running things.............................
|
|
|
Post by RiverJim on Aug 19, 2005 20:53:56 GMT -5
I've been feeding the beast a bunch lately. 5.2 V8 (318) full time 4X4 goin to the north side of indy all week. It's killin me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11
|
|
|
Post by jdmiller on Aug 20, 2005 17:32:15 GMT -5
In Murray , Ky. it was $2.49 and the highest this week was $2.63 .
Riverjim I can relate . I drive a Dodge full size quad cab 4wd. with a 5.9(360) to work everyday it took $54.00 to fill it up and the hand was showing a little past 1/4 tank and I just put $40.00 in my wifes Chevy Trailblazer. This is killing everyone whose outhere supporting their families . I bet with work and school activities were spending a good $500.00 a month . Anyone got a good idea how to strap a 200 pound deer on a bicycle .... I think thats where we are headed .
|
|
|
Post by RiverJim on Aug 20, 2005 17:49:48 GMT -5
[quote author=jdmiller board=campfire . Anyone got a good idea how to strap a 200 pound deer on a bicycle .... I think thats where we are headed . [/quote]
I actually have a camo bike that has a home made lounger stand with wheels that will haul a deer! But being the wore out ol fart I am it is now for the youngins. Right now they just ride each other around on it.
|
|
|
Post by Woody Williams on Aug 20, 2005 18:05:47 GMT -5
Anyone got a good idea how to strap a 200 pound deer on a bicycle .... I think thats where we are headed .
|
|
|
Post by RiverJim on Aug 20, 2005 19:28:22 GMT -5
I love it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by cday on Aug 21, 2005 16:23:48 GMT -5
Yet how many of us drive economy cars ? Aint hurting too bad yet. In regards to those refineries, G.W. needs to step in and kick some of the regulations out of the way to allow construction of a few. A big one in the northwest would allow us to use our Alaska oil. Meawhile, it's all going to Japan. Myself I have a 3 cylinder Geo Metro which gets close to 50 MPG. This is my work car and I travel 40 miles round trip. It is nice to still only spend $15.00 every week to fill it up. My truck is a older 4X4 doge that is only going to get 10 MPG, I only drive it anymore if I need it to haul anything. Just bought me a 2001 Jeep Cherokee Sport to drive during my hunting trips when I do not need 4X4. I think this one of the problems everyone is driving big trucks and SUV's and are consuming alot more than before. Yeah even the American auto companies really slashed prices of there bigger vehicles and only giving margin cuts on the more fuel effeicent vehilces. Look at their lots today down this way most are out of 2005 models. So instead of Americans buying a more fuel efficent vehicle that went and bought another feul guzzler because it was cheaper at the purchase. If we keep on going and if we have a severe winter don't be surpised to see it close to $5.00 a gallon because refiners will have to produce heating oils.
|
|
|
Post by Woody Williams on Aug 21, 2005 16:38:58 GMT -5
My old "SUVs" (only we never knew they were that) were
'65 Land Rover that got 9 mpg on a good day
'77 Chevy Blazer that got 10 mpg after I put lock out on the front wheels.
'83 Chevy S10 Blazer that got 18 mpg
'91 Mazda Navajo that got 18 mpg
'99 Toyota 4Runner (present vehicle) that gets 21 mpg..
We take the car (2001 Camry) most places we go.
|
|