|
Post by treetop on Mar 19, 2023 15:21:51 GMT -5
What gets me is they seem to be pushing the privacy issue more than the fair chase. Like was said earlier, if you want to stay private don’t go out in public. There’s nothing illegal about taking pictures of public places with people out and about. Can you go anywhere without getting your photo taken small town maybe a bit behind but here in Fort Wayne just about every store has cameras everywhere you look lot of the homes I’ve worked in your on film when you walk up to the home for security granted probably not a lot in the park but I’d be surprised if they don’t have a few here and there for security reasons
|
|
|
Post by saddlemaster on Mar 19, 2023 15:30:16 GMT -5
True. Then again, to legally run a camera on public ground here, you are supposed to have the property manager's permission. So, technically, they are banned here unless you get an exemption. That's not correct for Indiana. Trail/game cameras can be placed on properties managed by the Division of Fish & Wildlife, as well as on state forests, and state recreation areas as long as the camera is legibly marked with the owner's name, address, phone number or customer identification number issued by DNR. Placement of the camera must not damage a tree.
|
|
|
Post by firstwd on Mar 19, 2023 15:47:08 GMT -5
True. Then again, to legally run a camera on public ground here, you are supposed to have the property manager's permission. So, technically, they are banned here unless you get an exemption. That's not correct for Indiana. Trail/game cameras can be placed on properties managed by the Division of Fish & Wildlife, as well as on state forests, and state recreation areas as long as the camera is legibly marked with the owner's name, address, phone number or customer identification number issued by DNR. Placement of the camera must not damage a tree. Okay, thak you. I didn't realize that was changed last year.
|
|
|
Post by greghopper on Mar 19, 2023 17:52:20 GMT -5
About all cell cameras can be used as a regular camera……A Ban would be interesting 🤔
|
|
|
Post by jman46151 on Mar 20, 2023 15:15:23 GMT -5
What gets me is they seem to be pushing the privacy issue more than the fair chase. Like was said earlier, if you want to stay private don’t go out in public. There’s nothing illegal about taking pictures of public places with people out and about. If it was a fair chase issue, they would ban them even on private land. I could see banning them on Walk In areas out there because that is someone's private property but on public? I guess everyone can just stress the deer out more and chase them to private while they are scouting with their boots. I used a cell cam last year and all it did was show me the deer I spooked on my way in...lol. As for the "conflict" they cause, if I got a bunch of foot traffic on my cell cam I would hunt a different area.
|
|
mgf
Junior Member
Posts: 33
|
Post by mgf on May 13, 2023 21:26:57 GMT -5
The thought of having someone's camera on you when you're out in the woods in about as creepy as it gets. I say no cameras at all except on private property.
|
|
|
Post by whitetaildave24 on May 14, 2023 7:12:42 GMT -5
The thought of having someone's camera on you when you're out in the woods in about as creepy as it gets. I say no cameras at all except on private property. But it’s fine if you’re driving down the highway or out doing any sort of shopping in a store? Cameras are everywhere.
|
|
mgf
Junior Member
Posts: 33
|
Post by mgf on May 14, 2023 11:02:01 GMT -5
The thought of having someone's camera on you when you're out in the woods in about as creepy as it gets. I say no cameras at all except on private property. But it’s fine if you’re driving down the highway or out doing any sort of shopping in a store? Cameras are everywhere. Not that fine at all but I go to the woods to get away from that creepy stuff.
|
|