Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 18, 2011 21:34:59 GMT -5
-Got it, thanks
|
|
|
|
Post by js2397 on Oct 25, 2011 14:20:09 GMT -5
If anyone has questions give me a call at 812 384-1056 or email alan@ajbrownarms.com. I will be at the Indy 1500 this weekend. Alan Sent you a PM. I'm iterested in finding more about the price. |
|
jmac
New Member
Posts: 4
|
Post by jmac on Oct 27, 2011 18:45:57 GMT -5
dose anyone know what kind of distance this round will shoot?
|
|
|
|
Post by dbd870 on Oct 28, 2011 6:14:14 GMT -5
Here you go with 200yd zero using 180gr SSP's (in inches) 50:  .2 100: +2.5 150: +2.2 200: 0 250: -4.4 300: -11.4 350: -21.4 I'd cut it off at 300. Might push it a little farther if you have a B&C type reticle scope. 400yds it drops about 3 feet. For you energy people you have 1160ft-lbs at 300. |
|
|
|
Post by oldhoyt on Oct 28, 2011 6:20:20 GMT -5
My plan is to go with 200 grain round nose bullets. I'll probably zero for 150 yds. My shots are generally not over 100 yds. It will be fun to reload and shoot over the summer.
|
|
|
|
Post by lon371 on Oct 28, 2011 18:27:13 GMT -5
Would this be doable on an H&R? and which one? thanks
Lonny
|
|
|
|
Post by dbd870 on Oct 29, 2011 7:25:30 GMT -5
It will handle the 308 so I don't see why not.
|
|
|
|
Post by parson on Oct 29, 2011 7:40:07 GMT -5
On an H&R, I would guess that a .357 barrel could be rechambered for the round, but You'd need to have a SB-2 frame for sure. Current .357 & .44 rifles come from the factory on SB-1 frames, even though the barrel may be marked SB-2.
|
|
|
|
Post by lon371 on Oct 29, 2011 10:01:39 GMT -5
On an H&R, I would guess that a .357 barrel could be rechambered for the round, but You'd need to have a SB-2 frame for sure. Current .357 & .44 rifles come from the factory on SB-1 frames, even though the barrel may be marked SB-1. Sure would be nice to have one setting next to my H&R Maximum. Guess it is time for another .357 barrel.  Lonny |
|
|
|
Post by kodiak50 on Oct 30, 2011 4:30:19 GMT -5
Sure would be nice to have one setting next to my H&R Maximum. Guess it is time for another .357 barrel. Lonny[/quote] Same here Lonny, keep your eyes open for a pair of .357barrels |
|
|
|
Post by parson on Oct 30, 2011 6:10:41 GMT -5
Make that a trio of the 357s.
|
|
|
|
Post by parson on Oct 30, 2011 6:58:54 GMT -5
Anyone know what would be required to modify a .358 Win. barrel for a Savage 110 to accommodate this caliber?
|
|
|
|
Post by boman on Oct 30, 2011 7:42:30 GMT -5
Anyone know what would be required to modify a .358 Win. barrel for a Savage 110 to accommodate this caliber? barrel will have to be cut at the chamber end and rechambered for this round. I'm not familiar with shank length of the savage so it will take some measuring to see if its dooable. Steve |
|
|
|
Post by lon371 on Oct 31, 2011 13:47:21 GMT -5
On an H&R, I would guess that a .357 barrel could be rechambered for the round, but You'd need to have a SB-2 frame for sure. Current .357 & .44 rifles come from the factory on SB-1 frames, even though the barrel may be marked SB-1. Sure would be nice to have one setting next to my H&R Maximum. Guess it is time for another .357 barrel. Lonny Well I just got an email saying ajbrownarms.com does not rechamber H&R's. Anyone have any suggestions? Lonny |
|
|
|
Post by kodiak50 on Oct 31, 2011 13:53:30 GMT -5
Bummer!!!! Wonder if a reamer like we used for the Max is available or possible?
|
|
|
|
Post by lon371 on Oct 31, 2011 15:32:06 GMT -5
If someone has the patent or owns the rights to it, probably can not find a reamer to rent. But I dont know. I thought this was going to be an economical one i could afford. Guess I will just go back to the trimmed .35 Rem.
Lonny
|
|
|
|
Post by dbd870 on Nov 1, 2011 4:30:52 GMT -5
All this does make you wish they'd just let the 35 Remington in and be done with it - nothing to be gained by not doing it. (and the 30-30, 45-70 & 444 for that matter)
|
|
|
|
Post by oldhoyt on Nov 1, 2011 5:58:28 GMT -5
YES to 30/30 and 45/70 and 38/55 and 444 and 32 Special and 32/40 and 356 Win and 35 Rem and, and, and........................ These are all supassed by Indiana-legal wildcats.
|
|
|
|
Post by dbd870 on Nov 1, 2011 10:32:01 GMT -5
Yep, so let's put them in. 32 Special would be a fun one.
|
|
|
|
Post by oldhoyt on Nov 1, 2011 10:56:23 GMT -5
It begins to get crazy when you name allowable cartridges. If 30/30 is ok, then the guy with the 7/30 Waters wants to use that. Allow the 45/70, and the guy with the 45/90 wants to use that. Allow the 38/55 and the guy with the 375 Win wants to use that. Etc......
I have heard of a previous proposal that based allowable cartridges based on their date of origin. Don't know how well that would work. The 30/06 came on pretty early.
I'm half in favor of allowing all rifles, but not allowing optics on guns for cartridges not currently legal. This would allow lots of traditional moderate powered cartridges in open sighted guns. Guys that want higher velocities could still go to wildcat WSSMs.
I still think that after a few years Indiana will allow all rifles, assuming no icrease in accidents solely attributable to rifles.
|
|
