|
Post by jimstc on May 18, 2018 8:30:35 GMT -5
Yesterday I was at the archery pro shop dropping off my bow. I was talking with the owner and asked him how business was. We started talking about what was selling. He said that he has sold more of the new Mathews Triax than any bow since he has been in business, which is a long time. I was surprised since this is a 28" axle to axle bow. To me that is a short bow. I have always believed that accuracy and a/a length were directly related. Meaning that the longer the a/a the greater potential for accuracy. That is based on what pro archers shoot and my short lived ownership of a 30" a/a bow. Any thoughts, reflections or experiences with a "short" bow?
|
|
|
Post by dbd870 on May 18, 2018 9:56:07 GMT -5
I can only speak from the recurve side. I had a 48" SuperMag. It was just as accurate as my 62"; however it would show up any errors on my part easier. As long as I did my part it shot very well. I would guess it would be the same for a compound
|
|
|
Post by jimstc on May 18, 2018 10:40:30 GMT -5
I can only speak from the recurve side. I had a 48" SuperMag. It was just as accurate as my 62"; however it would show up any errors on my part easier. As long as I did my part it shot very well. I would guess it would be the same for a compound I understand now. A shorter a/a exposes my errors whereas a longer a/a may not. That makes sense to me. Thanks
|
|