|
Post by wesb81219 on Aug 19, 2016 19:33:24 GMT -5
I kinda like the rear deploying rages and g5 havoc
|
|
|
Post by trapperdave on Aug 20, 2016 11:24:15 GMT -5
If they break when you shoot a deer, just a matter of time before that failure costs you a deer. think about it
|
|
|
Post by bullseye on Aug 20, 2016 19:02:40 GMT -5
I switched to spitfire some years ago with a compound and had poorer penetration and lost a couple with good hits. Switched to a crossbow and stuck with the spitfire because the poi was same as field points. Lost a deer with a good hit first day out. Switched back to the good old thunderheads and adjusted the scope. Haven't lost a deer or had poor penetration from a good hit since. Lots seem to love them spitfire but I will stick with the durable good performing thunderheads. They are cheaper especially when you consider the arrows I lost because of poor penetration that led to a broken arrow on more than one occasion because of a broken arrow at the first tree a deer ran by with the arrow sticking out.
To the original question, marketing hype in my opinion, they all seem to be the same whether they say crossbow or not.
|
|