|
|
Post by Woody Williams on Nov 22, 2014 7:47:09 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by ridgerunner on Nov 22, 2014 20:50:31 GMT -5
That's interesting, but nothing too surprising.
|
|
|
|
Post by Woody Williams on Nov 22, 2014 20:54:41 GMT -5
That's interesting, but nothing too surprising. True, but I've seen many posts in different sites that disagree with one or more.. |
|
|
|
Post by greghopper on Nov 22, 2014 20:54:43 GMT -5
“There is very clear, very accepted scientific data regarding the impact of moon phase on the timing of the rut,” says Woods. “I was part of a group of 14 scientists collecting conception dates from does. We backdated the date of conception based on date of birth. It was a very large sample size, thousands of deer from several different regions. “And we found zero correlation to moon phase and the rut’s timing. None.”  |
|
|
|
Post by ridgerunner on Nov 23, 2014 7:56:37 GMT -5
That's interesting, but nothing too surprising. True, but I've seen many posts in different sites that disagree with one or more.. I agree with ya there. |
|
|
|
Post by tenring on Nov 23, 2014 8:39:06 GMT -5
Next year there will be another study to disprove this one, that disproved the previous one.
|
|
|
|
Post by ridgerunner on Nov 23, 2014 11:31:00 GMT -5
Next year there will be another study to disprove this one, that disproved the previous one. lol....no kidding...it's a moving target. It all comes down to interpretation and and perception. How does one interpret and perceive the data, or what they witness..everyone processes data differently..you see something and conclude one thing, I may see the same thing and conclude another...both may , or may not be right. |
|
