|
|
Post by raporter on Feb 17, 2008 9:16:28 GMT -5
But that's just me, I could be wrong.
No you aren't wrong.
|
|
|
|
Post by drgreyhound on Feb 18, 2008 5:49:32 GMT -5
Very true, and they have just as much reason to be upset as the "angry white man." In terms of calling this cohort the "angry white man," I interpreted the article as meaning that white men are oftentimes marginalized by affirmative action and other racist, discriminatory policies that want to make achievement easier for minorities and women. If I were a hard working, intelligent, honest member of a minority group, I'd be completely offended by these policies, as if my race or other superficial quality mattered more than my achievement or hard work. Liberal policies concerning race are simply the democratic parties form of racism. A few bucks here, some food stamps there, a pat on the head, "go back to your corner and be happy with what we've allowed you to have" type treatment. The Democratic party identifies everyone by race, gender, sexual preference, amount of wealth etc. Once you've been pigeonholed into a labeled group, they advocate separate, unequal treatment of these groups. Doesn't sound anything like democracy to me. But that's just me, I could be wrong. No, you're right...that's why these policies are the epitome of hypocricy! Ooooh, ooooh...can I go??? ;D |
|
|
|
Post by MaxLoad on Feb 19, 2008 17:08:44 GMT -5
I heard Rush read this article today. I had to visit the paper's site to copy it and send it to several friends.
Hit the nail very close to the head(except for the comments about Mr. Bush)
;D
|
|
|
|
Post by RiverJim on Feb 20, 2008 6:31:16 GMT -5
So won't you please give, to the united caw-kay-shun college fund? A mind is a terrible thing to waste!
|
|
